Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift

NCT03070873 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 258

Last updated 2017-03-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

DEVICE

Perigee and Apogee Mesh

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

DEVICE

Gynecare Prolift Mesh

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

PROCEDURE

Traditional Surgery

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nanjing Medical University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yu-Fei Shen · director of Gynecology Department , Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-01
Primary Completion
2014-01-30
Completion
2014-01-30
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03070873 on ClinicalTrials.gov