Randomized Bioimpedance vs Clinical Methods in Guiding Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

NCT01828658 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 131

Last updated 2013-10-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators developed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare strict volume control using bioimpedance (using the BCM - Body Composition Monitor device) versus traditional clinical volume control in hemodialysis patients and the impact on mortality, hydration status, blood pressure values and arterial stiffness.

Conditions

  • Haemodialyzed Patients
  • Volume Status

Interventions

OTHER

Strict bioimpedance guided dry weight prescription

Post dialysis patient dry weight was exclusively prescribed using the ideal weight measured by the BCM device (+/- 1.1 Kg).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Adrian Covic, Professor · University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, "Dr. C.I.Parhon" University Hospital Iasi, Nephrology Department

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-07-31
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2011-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01828658 on ClinicalTrials.gov