Diagnosis of Patients With Low or Intermediate Suspicion of SAHS or With Comorbidity: Standard Laboratory Polysomnography Compared With Three Nights of Home Respiratory Polygraphy.

NCT01820156 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56

Last updated 2015-03-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis using simplified methods such as home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) is only recommended in patients with a high pre-test probability. The aim is to determine the diagnostic efficacy, therapeutic decision-making and costs of OSA diagnosis using PSG or three consecutive studies of HRP in patients with mild-moderate suspicion of sleep apnea or with co-morbidity that can mask OSA symptoms.

Design and Setting: Randomized, blinded, crossover study of three nights of HRP (3N-HRP) vs. PSG. The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated with ROC curves. Therapeutic decisions to assess concordance between the two different approaches were analyzed by sleep physicians and respiratory physicians (staff and residents) using agreement level and kappa coefficient. The costs of each diagnostic strategy were considered.

Conditions

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

Home Respiratory Polygraphy

DEVICE

Standard Polysomnography

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-02-29
Primary Completion
2012-10-31
Completion
2013-06-30

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01820156 on ClinicalTrials.gov