Evaluation of PCLs Using Three EUS-FNA Needles

NCT01711294 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 250

Last updated 2021-01-15

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

To document impact of EUS-FNA needle size and flexibility on effectiveness of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspiration, on ability to obtain sufficient material for standard diagnostic testing, and on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA aspirate for differentiation of mucinous (pre-malignant) and non-mucinous cysts.

Conditions

  • Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Interventions

DEVICE

19 G Flex Needle

Fine Needle Aspiration of PCL with a 19 G Flex needle. If unsuccessful, a salvage procedure will be done with 19 G or 22 G needle.

DEVICE

22 G Needle

Fine Needle Aspiration of PCL with a 22 G needle. If unsuccessful, a salvage procedure will be done with 19 G Flex needle.

DEVICE

19 G Needle

Fine Needle Aspiration of PCL with a 19 G needle. If unsuccessful, a salvage procedure will be done with 19 G Flex needle.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Boston Scientific Corporation

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Michael B Wallace, MD,MPH · Mayo Clinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-01-08
Primary Completion
2017-06-06
Completion
2019-12-18

Countries

  • United States
  • China
  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01711294 on ClinicalTrials.gov