Local Anaesthesia vs Regional Block for Arteriovenous Fistulae

NCT01706354 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126

Last updated 2012-10-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

End stage renal failure (ESRF)describes an irreversible loss in renal function. The majority of these patients will opt for haemodialysis (HD)as their chosen method of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the optimal method of achieving vascular access to permit HD. AVF are created with a small surgical procdure to join the artery and vein together. Over the next 6- 8weeks after surgery the AVF should grow ("mature") into a vessel suitable for needles to be inserted for dialysis. Unfortunately however, around 24% - 35% of AVF fail at an early stage. Some anaesthetic techniques can influence intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter, factors which are associated with fistula success. There remains no conclusive evidence that any particular anaesthetic technique can significantly influence long term surgical outcome. This study aims to investigate whether a regional, compared to local, anaesthetic technique can affect fistula patency.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Local Anaesthetic

Infiltration of local anaesthetic into the surgical site by the surgeon using a combination of 0.5% L-bupivicaine prior to incision and 1% lignocaine topically after the wound is opened. Maximum dose limits of 2mg/kg for bupivicaine, and 3mg/kg for lignocaine will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

PROCEDURE

Regional anaesthetic

Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block. Supraclavicular will be the block performed unless there is a contraindication in which case axillary block may be used. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% L-bupivicaine and 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline (1 in 200,000) will be injected, up to a volume of 40ml but using a minimum of 25ml. Maximum dose limits of 2mg for bupivicaine and 7mg/kg for lignocaine with adrenaline will be observed, recognising that these are additive.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    collaborator OTHER
  • Emma Aitken

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marc Clancy, MBBS FRCS · NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-10-31
Primary Completion
2014-10-31
Completion
2015-10-31

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01706354 on ClinicalTrials.gov