Abdominal Binder to Reduce Pain and Seroma Formation
NCT01673568 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56
Last updated 2014-06-09
Summary
Postoperative seroma formation is one of the most common complications after ventral hernia repair. Although some seromas may not have clinical impact, postoperative seroma formation often causes pain and discomfort and may even compromise wound healing. The use of postoperative abdominal binder is often recommended after ventral hernia repair to prevent seroma and diminish pain, but still with no scientific evidence. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of postoperative abdominal binders after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair on postoperative pain, discomfort and quality of life. Secondary, we register seroma formation.
Method and material Randomized, controlled, multi-center, investigator-blinded study. A minimum of 56 patients (2X28 umbi/epi) are included, inclusion number is based on power calculations. Patients are randomized either to abdominal binder or no abdominal binder. The abdominal binder is worn from immediately after the operation and continuously for 7 days, night and day. Outcomes are based on patient self-reported registrations using Visual Analog Scales (VAS) and Carolina Comfort Scale (CCS), which is a validated, hernia-specific tool to estimate quality of life, pain and discomfort. Patients are followed-up for 30 days. For secondary outcome we use ultrasound to measure the volume of seroma formation. We use Mann-Witney, non-parametric statistics calculating the seroma formation and Friedmanns test for pain, discomfort and quality of life for the effect of time on inter- and intragroup differences during the study period. P \< 0.05 is considered significant.
Conditions
- Ventral Hernias
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
ETO garments
patients wearing abdominal binder for 7 days postoperatively
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
collaborator OTHER -
Hvidovre University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Thue Bisgaard, MD · University Hospital HVidovre
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2013-09-30
- Completion
- 2013-09-30
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effect of Sutures Versus Mesh in Umbilical Hernia Repair
NCT01635868 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Biological Mesh Repair of Complex Hernias in High Risk Patients
NCT01997619 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Incisional Hernia Repair by Abdominal Wall Component Release With Contemporary Onlay Mesh Fixation
NCT06178965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01719718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Persistent Pain After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01085110 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flexible Composite Next Generation Tissue Separating Mesh in Laparoscopic Incisional/Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01162564 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Laparoscopically Closing the Hernia Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair on Postoperative Pain
NCT01962480 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Case-control Study of Mesh-infection After a Size Tailored Hernia Repair With C-Qur V-Patch
NCT01761708 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Mesh Fixation With Intraperitoneal Tisseel
NCT00842842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Chronic Postoperative Pain After Laparoendoscopic Groin Hernia Repair
NCT04838028 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
MRI Imaging of Retromuscular Hernia Repair With CICAT Visible®
NCT02460029 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Predisposing Factors for Chronic Postherniotomy Pain
NCT00649142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic and Open Ventral Hernia Repair Using the Intramesh T1
NCT01816867 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05320055 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Risk of Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair With Mesh Fixation With Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Tacks
NCT01740882 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05233020 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair
NCT01350830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Preperitoneal Umbilical Mesh Area
NCT05576753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stapler Versus Glue for Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair
NCT00793286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Acellular Dermal in the Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Tension-free Reconstructions
NCT02469142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Hernia Belt in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06061068 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Recurrence and Other Complications Requiring Surgery Following Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT06783036 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Self-Expanding Multi-Layered Partially Resorbable Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh Device (Proceed Ventral Patch® Or Pvp®) For The Treatment of Small and Medium Umbilical Ventral Hernias
NCT01307696 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2