MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Carto Versus Ensite 3D Electroanatomical Mapping Systems for Arrhythmias Ablations

NCT01651702 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2017-04-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Three dimensional anatomical mapping is an established method facilitating ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. The most commonly used systems are CARTO® System (Biosense Webster, Inc., Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and EnSite NavX™ (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA). These two systems has been compared in only a few studies. Recent technical advances resulted in the development of new versions of both systems. To the best of the investigators knowledge no studies have been performed for direct comparison of the newer versions of these two systems. The aim of the study to compare two systems for the use in the ablation of complex arrhythmias.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Carto

Group of patients where Carto Express system will be used for electroanatomical mapping.

DEVICE

Ensite

Group of patients where Ensite Velocity system will be used for electroanatomical mapping.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rabin Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gregory Golovchiner, MD · Rabin Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-07-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-31
Completion
2016-10-31

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01651702 on ClinicalTrials.gov