MedTrace Logo

Laser Iridotomy Versus Surgical Iridectomy in Early Angle Closure

NCT01468103 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2011-11-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a randomized controlled clinical trial to compare laser peripheral iridotomy(LPI) and surgical peripheral iridectomy. Subjects of primary angle closure suspect, primary angle closure will be randomized to undergo LPI or SPI. Subjects are proposed to be followed up for 3 years.

Conditions

  • Intraocular Pressure Changes
  • Peripheral Anterior Synechiae Increasing

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Surgical Iridectomy

Surgical Iridectomy is now widely used in our clinical.

PROCEDURE

Laser Iridotomy

alternative choice to surgical iridectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sun Yat-sen University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Zhang X Lan, MD · Sun Yat-sen University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-08-31
Primary Completion
2012-08-31
Completion
2012-08-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01468103 on ClinicalTrials.gov