Plasmonic Photothermal and Stem Cell Therapy of Atherosclerosis Versus Stenting
NCT01436123 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62
Last updated 2015-05-19
Summary
Intensive therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ApoA-I Milano reduces the total atheroma volume (TAV) up to 6.38 or 14.1 mm3 respectively. Our previous bench studies PLASMONICS and NANOM First-in-Man trial documented TAV reduction up to unprecedented 79.4 and 60.3 mm3 respectively with high level of safety and feasibility.
The completed randomized two arm (1:1) study (NANOM-PCI) with parallel assignment (n=62) assessed (NCT01436123) the safety and feasibility of the delivery technique for nanoparticles (NP) using micro-injection catheter (with intravascular intramural injection of allogeneous stem cells carrying NP after MSCT-, IVUS- and OCT-guided mapping of the vessel), and plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis combined with stenting (Nano group, n=32) versus stenting with Xience V cage (Stenting group, n=30). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months.
The mean reduction of TAV at 12 months in Nano group was -84.1 mm3 (95% CI: SD 28.3; min -52.4 mm3, max -99.1 mm3; p\<0.05) versus +12.4 mm3 in case of stenting (p\<0.05 between groups). 42/62 patients (68%) in Nano group passed the Glagov threshold of a 40% plaque burden with mean plaque burden (PB) 36.2% (95% CI: SD 9.3%, min 30.9%, max 44.5%). The increase of the minimal lumen diameter was 61.2 and 63.3% at 12 month follow up in groups respectively. The serial assessment of VH-IVUS showed a significant decrease at 12 months in the dense calcium area, fibrous and fibro-fatty tissue with fulminant necrosis due to thermolysis in Nano-group, whereas an increase of fibrous and fibro-fatty components in stenting arm. We have documented 2 vs 3 cases of the definite thrombosis and 3 vs 5 cases of target lesion revascularization in groups respectively. The analysis of the event-free survival of the ongoing clinical follow-up shows the significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death in Nano group if compare with conventional stenting (93.4% vs 86.7%; p\<0.05).
Plasmonic resonance-mediated therapy using noble-metal NP associated with significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Tested delivery approach has acceptable safety and efficacy for atheroregression below a 40% PB.
The investigators hypothesize that multistep approach with the use of stent in acute care unit, and then subsequent transcatheter micro-injection with nanoparticles can resolve atherosclerosis, stop and regress atherogenesis, remodulate or even rejuvenate arteries. Stem cells in patch can be good carriers for nanoparticles as well as high-effective metabolic vectors (paracrine-like regulation of alive cells and via bioactive products of cell lysis after detonation of nanoparticles) for the treatment of plaque on site. Gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells promise high-energy plasmonic photothermic burning or melting effect under the near-infrared laser irradiation onto the lesion. Thus the investigators expect complex two-side effect on the plaque with protected lumen and adventitia.
Novel discoveries in atherogenesis, and development of nanobiotechnologies with potentials for the management of atherosclerosis leads us to the quest of new approaches. The investigators still cannot really effectively treat atherosclerosis.
The investigators management is more symptomatic, and lipid-pool or inflammation-oriented! The investigators cannot manage non-organic part (mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, partially collagen and fibrotic tissue) and total plaque volume Surgery and invasive procedures is just focused on blood flow restoration (just manipulate the form of plaque) + concerns of clinical and technical restrictions (incl. alien body - stent) + risk of restenosis or subacute 'fatal' in-stent atherothrombosis + graft survival/ occlusion + surgery-related complications High rate of short- and long-term complications and readmissions. Regression of atherosclerosis in fact is still a dream. The investigators offer an alternative to stenting and may be cardiac artery bypass surgery (CABG). Our approach can really allow to rejuvenate arteries, Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) can burn plaque, but stem cells and bioengineered structures promise restoration of the vessel wall.
Our personal previous data showed that PPTT can 1.6-fold reduce a volume of plaque with most optimal long-term result in subsets with the use of SPCs as a delivery approach. The most optimal delivery systems of NPs into the plaque are the on-artery bioengineered patch and ferro-magnetic approach.
Conditions
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Stenting and micro-infusion of NP
Step 1 - IVUS, OCT-guided put in everolimus-eluting (drug-eluting-DES) stent + intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) mapping + harvesting stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype; Step 2 - culturing of stem cells in medium by gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells; Step 3 - micro-infusion of stem cells bearing NP into the lesion; Step 4 - detonation of nanoshells after migration of stem cells with NPs inside (until 7-10 days after transplantation). We expect 'melting' and 'burning' effects of PPTT, beneficial effects of bioactive products of stem cells lysis + benefits from further migration of stem cells from patch into the plaque
- DEVICE
-
Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent
Put stent in ischemia-related coronary artery by indications for PCI
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ural Institute of Cardiology
collaborator OTHER -
De Haar Research Foundation
collaborator OTHER -
Ural Federal University
collaborator OTHER -
Ural State Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., Ph.D. · Ural Institute of Cardiology
-
Jan Gabinsky, M.D., Ph.D. · Ural Institute of Cardiology
-
Olga Kovtun, M.D., Ph.D. · Ural State Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-07-31
- Completion
- 2012-10-31
Countries
- Netherlands
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)
NCT00140530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy Study of Rapamycin- vs. Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents to Reduce Coronary Restenosis
NCT00598533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of the ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Stent System in Coronary Arteries
NCT00140101 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Systemic Treatment With Everolimus for the Prevention of MACE After Bare Metal Stent Implantation
NCT00426049 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Efficacy of Three Different Limus Agent-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis
NCT00332397 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of the YUKON Drug Eluting Stent in Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease
NCT01418794 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of the ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Stent System in Coronary Arteries
NCT00148356 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Relationship Between Initial Plaque Characteristics and Stent Surface Coverage Patterns
NCT01024179 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Brazilian and Italian Evaluation of Safety Using Tacrolimus-eluting Stent With Short-term Dual Antiplatelet Regimen
NCT01122719 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
STEMI Treated With a Polymer-free Sirolimus-coated Stent and P2Y12 Inhibitor-based SAPT Versus Conventional DAPT
NCT05785897 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary FIbrinolysis and Secondary STenting Versus immEdiate Stenting in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT04663932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Conor Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent to the Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-eluting Coronary Stent in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT00606333 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrathin-strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stents With P2Y12 Inhibitor-based Single Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Conventional DAPT for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (ULTIMATE-LM)
NCT05650411 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
BES, EES, and ZES-R in Real World Practice
NCT01397175 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Comparison of Early and Late Vascular Responses to Everolimus-eluting Cobalt-CHromium Stent and Platelet AggregatioN studIeS for TreatMent of Acute Myocardial InfarctionTreatment of ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT02014753 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy and Safety of Nano+ Polymer-free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: A Optical Coherent Tomography Study
NCT01925027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of the Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus-eluting Stent Versus the Nano Polymer-free Sirolimus-eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Stenotic Lesions
NCT02542007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Biolimus A9-eluting Stent With the Zotarolimus -Eluting Stent in Multi-vessel PCI
NCT01947439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)
NCT00752362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
China Made Sirolimus Eluting Stent for Intermediate Lesion
NCT01375296 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of a New Nanotechnology Based Drug-Eluting Stent for Opening of Narrowed Arteries of the Heart
NCT00428662 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect and Efficacy of Onyx™, Zotarolimus-eluting Stent for Coronary Atherosclerosis
NCT03151018 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Efficacies of The New Paclitaxel-Eluting CoroflexTM Please Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT00699543 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Study Examining the PROMUS Element Everolimus-eluting Stent in Multi-center Coronary Intervention of Complex Arterial Lesion Subsets
NCT01670318 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RESOLUTE China RCT
NCT01334268 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA