MedTrace Logo

Percutaneous Versus Open Plate Fixation of Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures

NCT01405703 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 35

Last updated 2015-07-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective, level II evidence comparison between two cohorts. This study is designed to compare the percutaneous versus open approach for plate fixation of diaphyseal clavicle fractures. This study includes questionnaires and measurements that will collect data on incision-related numbness, union rates, overall outcomes, complication rates of the two methods, infection rates, and overall satisfaction. The surgical procedure, all radiographs and follow-up visits to a minimum of one year are the principle investigators (PI's) standard of care for this injury. Measurements and questionnaires are related to the study.

Conditions

  • Clavicle Fracture

Interventions

OTHER

xrays

xrays from 2 week postop to 5 year postop

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Erik Kubiak, MD · University of Utah

  • Thomas Christensen, MD · University of Utah

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-07-31
Primary Completion
2015-05-31
Completion
2015-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01405703 on ClinicalTrials.gov