Plate Osteosynthesis Versus ESIN of Displaced Midclavicular Fractures

NCT01015924 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 125

Last updated 2014-01-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two widely used operative techniques on displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in functional outcome.

Conditions

  • Clavicle Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

plate osteosynthesis

Patients are operated upon within 3 w of the fracture

PROCEDURE

ESIN

Elastiv stable intramedullary nailing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Akershus

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Stein Erik Utvag, MD PhD · University of Oslo

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-07-31
Primary Completion
2013-09-30
Completion
2013-09-30

Countries

  • Norway

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01015924 on ClinicalTrials.gov