MedTrace Logo

"Laparoscopic" Cystoscopy Versus Traditional Cystoscopy

NCT01261819 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66

Last updated 2020-10-08

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The study aimed to compare the use of a transurethral laparoscope to the use of a traditional cystoscope for evaluation of the bladder and ureters at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The hypothesis was that visual inspection of the bladder and ureters can be done safely using a transurethral laparoscope, takes less time than traditional cystoscopy, and is more cost effective than traditional cystoscopy.

Conditions

  • Lower Urinary Tract Injury

Interventions

DEVICE

cystoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • AdventHealth

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Katherine Kratz, M.D. · AdventHealth

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-01-31
Primary Completion
2009-07-31
Completion
2009-07-31

Countries

  • United States

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01261819 on ClinicalTrials.gov