Ketofol vs Propofol for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
NCT01211158 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 284
Last updated 2011-11-17
Summary
When patients come to the Emergency Department with injuries and infections they often need to have painful procedures performed that are essential to allowing them to recover. To accomplish this, doctors often use "procedural sedation". This involves giving medications through an intravenous line in order to relieve the patient's pain and to make them drowsy while the painful procedure is being performed. This allows the medical staff to perform necessary procedures to patients without causing pain and anguish.
There are several types of medications and combinations of medications that are used for procedural sedation. Each medication has its advantages and its disadvantages. Consequently, research is necessary to determine which medication or combination of medications is the most effective and the safest. This study will compare the use of one drug (Propofol) versus the use of a combination of Propofol with another drug (Ketamine). Both of these drugs are already used for procedural sedations in the emergency department but it is not known which of them is the best or the safest.
The investigators believe that the combination of ketamine and propofol together will work as good or better than propofol alone and be a safer option as well. Propofol is a well known sedative that is used in many emergency departments and the clinical experience with it has been very good because it acts quickly and wears off quickly. However, propofol is not a good pain-killer and it can also cause patients to stop breathing. This is why monitoring a patient's breathing and vital signs is essential for any procedural sedation. It is known that ketamine is a good pain-killer and helps patients to maintain their breathing. Doctors sometimes use ketamine alone for procedural sedation but patients take a very long time to wake up when ketamine only is used.
Thus, the investigators think that by combining ketamine with propofol the investigators can perform painful procedures using procedural sedation without causing patients to stop breathing as often as with propofol alone. Also, the ketamine the investigators use will help treat their pain and make them more comfortable.
The investigators plan to enroll 284 patients over the course of about one year. The primary outcome of adverse respiratory events, as well as the secondary outcomes will be assessed during the course of the sedation and recovery period, approximately one hour. Quality of life score and pain will be assessed by telephone interview 3 days after the procedure.
Conditions
- Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
- Fracture Reduction
- Abscess Incision and Drainage
- Electrical Cardioversion
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Ketofol
Syringes containing ketofol (mixed propofol-ketamine) will contain propofol 5mg/ml and ketamine 5 mg/ml. Patients will receive an initial intravenous dose of 0.075 millilitres per kilogram of pre-prepared medication. Patients in the propofol-ketamine group will receive 0.375 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol as an initial bolus and 0.188 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol as necessary until reaching deep sedation (Ramsay score = 5 or greater).
- DRUG
-
Propofol alone
Propofol-only syringes will contain propofol 10 mg/ml. Patients in each group will receive an initial intravenous dose of 0.075 millilitres per kilogram of pre-prepared medication (0.75 mg/kg). One minute after the initial dose of sedative, and every minute thereafter, the attending physician will assess the patient's level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). If the attending physician determines the level of sedation to be inadequate (RSS\<5), additional study drug will be administered at a dose of 0.0375 millilitres per kilogram (0.375 mg/kg) every minute until deep sedation is achieved (RSS=5 or greater).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
collaborator OTHER -
University of British Columbia
collaborator OTHER -
Lions Gate Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Gary Andolfatto, MD · Lions Gate Hospital, University of British Columbia Department of Emergency Medicine
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-09-30
- Completion
- 2011-09-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Randomized Clinical Trial of Propofol, 1:1 and 4:1 Combination of Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation
NCT01260662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of Ketofol (Ketamine and Propofol Admixture) Versus Propofol as Induction Agents on Hemodynamic Parameters
NCT01065350 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ketamine Versus Co-administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT01387139 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Orthopedic Reductions
NCT00596050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol as Induction Agents for Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT07273851 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Current Procedural Sedation Practices in a Canadian Community Emergency Department
NCT04172415 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ketamine / Propofol Admixture "Ketofol" at Induction in the Critically Ill Against Etomidate: KEEP PACE Trial
NCT02105415 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy
NCT02295553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Propofol Versus Ketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT05092152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Compare the Effect of Propofol vs. "Ketofol" on Hemodynamic Stability During Induction of General Anesthesia
NCT02282891 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Anesthetic Techniques in EP Patients
NCT02664922 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Recovery After Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Ketofol Versus Mixture of Ketofol and Lidocaine for Short Pediatric Surgery
NCT04467424 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Inhaled Nitrous Oxide for the Prevention of Emergence Reaction During Ketamine Administration in Adults, a Pilot Study
NCT02145169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergence Delirium in Children: Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol and Remifentanil Versus Inhalational Sevoflurane Anesthesia
NCT00885443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation
NCT03442803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Efficacy of Ketamine and Propofol Mixture With 1:6 Ratio and 1:4 Ratio for Endoscopic Retrograde Procedure Sedation
NCT03196479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Propofol Versus Alfentanil Versus Nitrous Oxide for Moderate Procedural Sedation
NCT00997126 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Propofol, Propofol-remifentanil and Propofol-ketamine Anesthesia During Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT02819375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Moderate Versus Deep Procedural Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department
NCT02404610 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ketamine Sedation As Neuroprotective Agent Following Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT06744361 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Co-administration of Propofol and Remifentanil for Lumbar Puncture in Children
NCT00405522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Sedation During Pediatric Diagnostic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
NCT03235609 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ketamine for Endoscopic Sedation in Outpatient Adult Endoscopy.
NCT03461718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparing Anesthetic Techniques in Children Having Esophagogastroduodenoscopies
NCT02038894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA