MedTrace Logo

Goal Directed Haemodynamic Treatment for Patients With Proximal Femoral Fracture

NCT01141894 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2020-09-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aimed to compare the costs and consequences of 'routine perioperative fluid therapy' and 'GDHT in terms of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, activity of daily living, health related quality of life, cognitive functions and need of social services and up till 12 months following operations of proximal femoral fracture at elderly. The primary hypothesis is that 'GDHT is a better strategy than 'routine fluid therapy' in terms of reduced frequency of postoperative complications.

Conditions

  • Femoral Fracture

Interventions

OTHER

Goal directed haemodynamic treatment

Treatment by fluids and Dobutamine to attain fixed haemodynamic goal

OTHER

Routine fluid treatment

Protocol guided fluid treatment used in the clinical routine

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Erzsebet Bartha, M.D · Karolinska Institutet

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-03-31
Primary Completion
2014-03-31
Completion
2014-10-31

Countries

  • Sweden

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01141894 on ClinicalTrials.gov