Comparison of Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Diathermy in Perforator Flap Elevation for Head and Neck Reconstruction

NCT01092468 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2011-10-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is to compare the efficacy of Harmonic Scalpel with conventional diathermy technique in terms of reducing elevation time and perioperative complications of perforator flaps for head and neck reconstruction.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Diathermy

flap dissection with conventional diathermy

PROCEDURE

Harmonic Scalpel

flap dissection using harmonic scalpel (FOCUS)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-01-31
Primary Completion
2011-08-31
Completion
2011-08-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01092468 on ClinicalTrials.gov