Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

NCT01074047 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 488

Last updated 2017-08-29

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of azacitidine (Vidaza) to conventional care regimens on overall survival in elderly AML patients.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Azacitidine

75 mg/m\^2 subcutaneous (SC) daily for 7 days for 28 day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

DRUG

Conventional Care Regimen

Physician pre-selects prior to randomization from one of the following: * Intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine 100-200 mg/m\^2 continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days + anthracycline IV x 3 days) + Best Supportive Care; induction with up to 2 consolidation cycles * Low-dose cytarabine 20 mg subcutaneous (SC) twice a day (BID) for 10 days, for 28 day cycles + BSC; until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity * Best Supportive Care only; until study end

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Celgene

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • C L Beach, PharmD · Celgene Corporation

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-06-01
Primary Completion
2014-01-22
Completion
2016-07-25
FDA Drug
Yes

Countries

  • United States
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Canada
  • China
  • Czechia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Russia
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Taiwan
  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01074047 on ClinicalTrials.gov