MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Hyperemic Efficacy Between Central and Peripheral Adenosine Infusion for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Measurement

NCT01070420 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66

Last updated 2011-07-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the peripheral IV continuous infusion without the insertion of central venous vascular access method in the achievement of steady-state maximal coronary hyperemia compared with the central IV continuous infusion method.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

FFR via central venous line

Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via Rt central femoral vein.

OTHER

FFR via peripheral venous line

Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via continuous peripheral vein.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bon- Kwon Koo, MD, PhD · Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-12-31
Primary Completion
2011-04-30
Completion
2011-05-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01070420 on ClinicalTrials.gov