Stability and 3D Motion Study of an Experimental Prosthetic Foot
NCT00968292 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2009-08-28
Summary
The investigators are currently verifying early data showing that the K3 Promoter prosthetic foot affects walking efficiency or stability in transtibial, unilateral amputees when compared to their current prostheses. Phase II funds are being used to address these metrics. These studies are important basic research, however, while Tensegrity has the unique opportunity to study amputee gait and movement in the CGMA's state-of-the-art facility the investigators will expand these studies with BRDG-SPAN funding by studying the following metrics:
1. Four Square Step Test (FSST)
2. Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
3. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
4. Quality of life (QOL) index (SF-36)
5. Activity-specific Balance Confidence Questionnaire (ABC)
6. 3D motion analysis
Conditions
- Amputation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Experimental prosthetics foot (K3 Promoter)
The tests will be unblinded randomized studies of the subject's current prosthetic foot and the K3 Promoter on traumatic/congenital amputees and dysvascular/diabetic amputees. Assessments will be made after a 30-day accommodation period with each foot prosthesis. In order to randomize the treatment and factor out habituation to the testing site and the protocol, two cohorts will be used. Half of the volunteers will be randomly assigned to be fitted with the K3 Promoter by their regular prosthetist or will continue wearing their current foot prothesis. Both cohorts will have a 30-day accommodation period. Subjects in either cohort will then visit the CGMA to be tested. Volunteers will then use the other prosthesis for 30 days. After that second 30-day period, height and weight will again be recorded, and the tests will be repeated. Because of anticipated difficulty with scheduling, volunteers will be given a +3 day grace period on the 30 day-accommodation time.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tensegrity Prosthetics
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Jerome Rifkin, MS · Tensegrity Prosthetics
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-08-31
- Completion
- 2010-08-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effect of Strain-counterstrain on Ankle Instability
NCT02025569 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Community Walking Trials: Comparing Prosthetic Feet
NCT03703232 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Microprocessor Controlled and Carbon Fiber Prosthetic Feet in Transtibial Amputees
NCT02864693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Active and Passive Ankle-foot Prostheses
NCT01684501 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Performance of Dynamic Elastic Response Feet
NCT02542761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel, Compliant Low Profile Prosthetic Foot
NCT06468059 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Longitudinal Outcomes Study of the Subchondroplasty® Procedure in the Foot/Ankle
NCT03087396 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Determining the Potential Benefit of Powered Prostheses
NCT02828982 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Protected Full Weight-bearing vs. Partial Weight-bearing After Surgical Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures, Monitored With Bio-feedback Insoles.
NCT06023979 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Frontal Plane Adaptability in a Novel Foot Prosthesis
NCT06214026 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Lower Limb Prostheses for Individuals Who Carry Infants, Toddlers, and Other Loads
NCT07159490 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adherence and Perspiration While Wearing Lower Limb Prostheses
NCT03900845 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Effects of Three Types of Foot Orthoses in Individuals With Posterior Tibialis Tendon Dysfunction
NCT06399237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
What is the Optimal Stiffness and Height of a Running-specific Prosthesis?
NCT02318979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Thermo-plastic Versus Carbon Foot Ankle Orthosis to Improve Gait and Reduce Fatigue in Post-stroke Patients: a Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Study
NCT04323943 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Protheses
NCT05112679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Software Generated Customized Foot Orthoses
NCT05462912 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of an Ankle Foot Orthoses for Ambulatory Function
NCT01336517 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
An Evaluation Of Healthy Ankle Motion And Morphology
NCT03619382 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Characterizing Ankle Function During Sloped Locomotion for Prosthesis Development
NCT01784003 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Safety of Reusing Walking Boot Components for Patients Recovering From Acute Foot and Ankle Injuries
NCT07287969 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Footplate Stiffness on Foot Loading Within Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthoses
NCT07312032 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Study of Different Prostheses for Unilateral Transtibial Amputees During Indoor and Outdoor Activities
NCT06390033 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Various Prosthetic Foot-Ankle Mechanisms
NCT05964855 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Steel and Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation of Lisfranc Foot Injuries
NCT00689962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4