Comparison of Ways to Prepare Patients for Decisions About Joint Replacement Surgery

NCT00911638 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 343

Last updated 2018-09-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Ministries of Health consider wait lists for total joint replacement a top priority. Research priorities to manage wait lists indicate the need to establish benchmarks that consider patient preferences. However, patients' preferences for hip or knee replacements are strongly associated with their misperceptions of the indicators for, and the risks and benefits of, these procedures. These misperceptions can be corrected with the use of patient decision aids. When decision aids are used in combination with assessing surgical eligibility, there may be a reduction in unnecessary referrals for surgery either because the patient is ineligible or because the eligible candidates make informed decisions to forgo this option. The primary study objective is to evaluate the effect of patient decision aids (PtDAs) on total wait times (wait times for surgical consultation, plus wait times for surgery) when used in combination with a general practitioner run clinic to screen patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis for surgical eligibility. Major secondary objectives include determining (a) the effect of PtDAs on surgery rates within two years, (b) the effect of PtDAs on decision quality, and (c) cost-effectiveness of PtDAs for total joint arthroplasty.

Conditions

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Patient decision aid

Patients will receive i) Patient education:usual take home education brochure from recruiting hospital ii)a video/DVD PtDA for either hip (Treatment choices for hip osteoarthritis) or knee (Treatment choices for knee osteoarthritis) © Health Dialog 2005. iii) a personal decision form:an interactive form used by patients after the DVD to elicit their knowledge, values, preferred option, and perceptions of the decision making process. iv) Referred onward to the surgeon with their preferences for surgery using a standardized report of their clinical findings plus decisional data (knowledge, values, preference).

BEHAVIORAL

Usual care

Patients will receive i) the usual take-home educational brochure available at the recruiting hospital describing preparation for surgery after the decision is made, recovery after surgery, and discharge plans. ii) Referral onward to surgeon with a standardized report of clinical findings only

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Ottawa Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Queensway Carleton Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Ottawa

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Toronto

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Chicago

    collaborator OTHER
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

    collaborator OTHER
  • Northwestern University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dawn Stacey, RN PhD · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-05-31
Primary Completion
2012-01-31
Completion
2017-05-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00911638 on ClinicalTrials.gov