Randomized Control Trial to Study the Efficacy of the Surgical Mask Versus the N95 Respirator to Prevent Influenza

NCT00756574 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 447

Last updated 2018-10-29

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of the surgical mask to the N95 respirator in protecting nurses from influenza in the hospital setting. The investigators propose a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial whereby nurses are randomized to either a surgical mask or an N95 respirator when caring for patients with febrile respiratory illness during the influenza season. The hypothesis is that the surgical mask offers similar protection against influenza to that of the N95. The specific objective of the study is to assess whether the rates of influenza (laboratory-confirmed by PCR and HAI assay), as well as secondary outcomes (influenza-like illness, work-related absenteeism, physician visits for respiratory illness, and lower respiratory infection), are similar among nurses using a surgical mask compared to those using an N95 respirator.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Surgical mask

Surgical mask worn for patients with febrile respiratory illness

DEVICE

N95 mask

N95 mask worn for patients with febrile respiratory illness

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Mark Loeb, MD, MSc · Hamilton Health Sciences - McMaster University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-10-31
Primary Completion
2009-04-30
Completion
2009-05-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00756574 on ClinicalTrials.gov