Efficacy and Safety of Standard Oral Colonoscopic Preparations With or Without Neostigmine Compared to Pulse-Irrigation Colonic Lavage
NCT00745095 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 360
Last updated 2014-07-16
Summary
The annual incidence of colorectal cancer in the US during 2005 was approximately 150,000 cases and this neoplasm claimed 56,000 lives (American Cancer Society). Detection (and removal) of colonic polyps is now the central strategy in reducing the risk of colon cancer. Thus, failure to detect and remove small cancers and polyps can have dire consequences. Although it has not been shown that persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) have an increased risk of this disease, there is no reason to assume that the incidence after SCI would be less than that of the general population.
Colonoscopy would appear to be a better approach to colon cancer screening after SCI but may also be unreliable if bowel evacuation is unsatisfactory for complete large bowel visualization. Poor colonoscopic visualization is a major concern in persons with SCI because they have long-standing difficulty with evacuation (DWE) and might not respond in a predictable or satisfactory manner to the conventional bowel preparations used for colonoscopy. Furthermore, to the extent that bowel preparation for colonoscopy is unsatisfactory in persons with SCI, the putative benefits of colonoscopy in reducing colon cancer mortality may not be realized.
In the absence of effective regimens for bowel preparation in persons with SCI, we suspect that the documented benefits of screening colonoscopy in the able-bodied may not generalize to persons with SCI. Regardless, these observations support the need for improved bowel preparation approaches in persons with SCI. One such approach might involve the adjunctive administration of prokinetic drugs to standard practices. A prokinetic agent that might be beneficial in this context is neostigmine, an anticholinesterase inhibitor with prominent parasympathomimetic actions (stimulation of peristalsis) on the colon. We have studied neostigmine extensively in persons with SCI and have shown that, when given in combination with glycopyrrolate, this approach to stimulate bowel evacuation is safe and effective for bowel evacuation.
Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Neostigmine
Neostigmine will be administered in 20, 40, and 60mg doses until an individualized dose-response relationship is established
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
US Department of Veterans Affairs
lead FED
Principal Investigators
-
Mark A. Korsten, MD · VA Medical Center, Bronx
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2013-03-31
- Completion
- 2013-05-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study on the Impact of Education Website on the Quality of Outpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02466724 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Randomized Trial of Polypectomy Techniques for 4-6 mm Colonic Polyps
NCT04666194 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Split-Dose Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Regimens
NCT03298945 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Patient Satisfaction With Propofol for Out Patient Colonoscopy
NCT02937506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Virtual Colonoscopy (VC) for Primary Colorectal Screening
NCT00204867 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Colorectal Cancer Screnning Colonoscopy Under Hypnosis
NCT05051046 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Competency and Metrics for PoLypectomy Skills Using Evaluation Tools and VidEo Feedback (COMPLETE)
NCT03115008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Development and Validation for Predicting Inadequate Bowel Preparation
NCT04290715 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Outcome of Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance
NCT01827241 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Standard Colonoscopy Versus Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision
NCT03361917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Colonoscopy by Videocapsuls Versus Standard Colonoscopy. Intra-individual Comparison for the Subject With a Medium or High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.
NCT00436514 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods
NCT02250196 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Impact of Experience on Results With the Third Eye Retroscope
NCT00969124 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation Adequacy for Colonoscopy
NCT05107505 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
An Interactive Video Educational Tool Improves the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT04491565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Model Identifies Painful Sedation-free Colonoscopy
NCT06635941 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Patient Education Website on the Quality of Outpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02804737 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT00920751 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Inspection During Insertion Improve Adenoma Yields During Colonoscopy?
NCT01035775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Aided Detection of Polyps in the Colon
NCT03925337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Experimental Device to Improve Colonoscopy
NCT00719641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Individualized Intervention on the Quality of Bowel Preparation
NCT04446195 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Related to a Persistent Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT04693299 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Colorectal Polyp Clinical Decision Support Device Study
NCT04437615 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Implementation of Optical Diagnosis for Diminutive Polyps Amongst Endoscopists: Training and Long-term Quality Assurance
NCT02407925 ·Status: COMPLETED