Efficacy and Safety of Standard Oral Colonoscopic Preparations With or Without Neostigmine Compared to Pulse-Irrigation Colonic Lavage

NCT00745095 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 360

Last updated 2014-07-16

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The annual incidence of colorectal cancer in the US during 2005 was approximately 150,000 cases and this neoplasm claimed 56,000 lives (American Cancer Society). Detection (and removal) of colonic polyps is now the central strategy in reducing the risk of colon cancer. Thus, failure to detect and remove small cancers and polyps can have dire consequences. Although it has not been shown that persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) have an increased risk of this disease, there is no reason to assume that the incidence after SCI would be less than that of the general population.

Colonoscopy would appear to be a better approach to colon cancer screening after SCI but may also be unreliable if bowel evacuation is unsatisfactory for complete large bowel visualization. Poor colonoscopic visualization is a major concern in persons with SCI because they have long-standing difficulty with evacuation (DWE) and might not respond in a predictable or satisfactory manner to the conventional bowel preparations used for colonoscopy. Furthermore, to the extent that bowel preparation for colonoscopy is unsatisfactory in persons with SCI, the putative benefits of colonoscopy in reducing colon cancer mortality may not be realized.

In the absence of effective regimens for bowel preparation in persons with SCI, we suspect that the documented benefits of screening colonoscopy in the able-bodied may not generalize to persons with SCI. Regardless, these observations support the need for improved bowel preparation approaches in persons with SCI. One such approach might involve the adjunctive administration of prokinetic drugs to standard practices. A prokinetic agent that might be beneficial in this context is neostigmine, an anticholinesterase inhibitor with prominent parasympathomimetic actions (stimulation of peristalsis) on the colon. We have studied neostigmine extensively in persons with SCI and have shown that, when given in combination with glycopyrrolate, this approach to stimulate bowel evacuation is safe and effective for bowel evacuation.

Conditions

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Interventions

DRUG

Neostigmine

Neostigmine will be administered in 20, 40, and 60mg doses until an individualized dose-response relationship is established

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Mark A. Korsten, MD · VA Medical Center, Bronx

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-03-31
Primary Completion
2013-03-31
Completion
2013-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00745095 on ClinicalTrials.gov