Comparison of Intraoperative Warming Devices

NCT00711867 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 55

Last updated 2009-12-15

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The sublingual (under the tongue) core temperature within 10 minutes of arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) for patients warmed with the Dynatherm vitalHeat2 (VH2) System under general anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty will be equivalent to that of patients warmed with the Arizant Bair Hugger System.

Conditions

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty

Interventions

DEVICE

VH2

Dynatherm vitalHeat2 (VH2) temperature management system.

DEVICE

Bair Hugger

Arizant Bair Hugger temperature management system.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dynatherm Medical Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Mayo Clinic

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kent Weinmeister, M.D. · Mayo Clinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-07-31
Primary Completion
2008-12-31
Completion
2008-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00711867 on ClinicalTrials.gov