MedTrace Logo

Study Comparing Mini-Incision Versus 2-Incision Approach for Total Hip Replacement

NCT00594893 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72

Last updated 2012-08-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the research is to determine if there is a difference between two of the commonly used less invasive techniques (surgical methods that use a smaller incision or cut in the skin) used to perform total hip arthroplasty (replacement of your painful hip with a new ball and socket). It is unclear which of these techniques is associated with a faster recovery and lower risk of complications.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Mini Incision Approach

Mini Incision Approach

PROCEDURE

2 Incision Approach

2 Incision Approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zimmer Biomet

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Rush University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Craig J DellaValle, MD · Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-06-30
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2010-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00594893 on ClinicalTrials.gov