MedTrace Logo

A Randomised Multi-centre Study to Compare the Short-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Surgery in Primary Total Hip Replacement

NCT00208416 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58

Last updated 2016-05-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of two surgical techniques, minimally invasive and conventional, when used in the treatment of patients with hip joint disease requiring a total hip replacement. Patients who enter the study will be randomly allocated to undergo surgery using the minimally invasive or conventional surgical technique and will be evaluated at regular intervals following hip surgery using patient, clinical and x-ray assessments with a focus on short term rehabilitation.

Conditions

  • Osteoarthritis(Primary)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

DePuy MI System

A minimally invasive surgical technique used in total hip replacement.

PROCEDURE

Conventional surgical technique

A conventional surgical technique used in total hip replacement

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • DePuy International

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-10-31
Primary Completion
2007-12-31
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00208416 on ClinicalTrials.gov