MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Two Optional IVC Filters Regardind Ease of Use,Complications and Outcome

NCT00588757 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2008-01-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

OptEase filters are easier to retrieve but the dwell time is shorter than the Gunter filters. There are more thrombi on the OptEase than on the Gunter at the time of retrieval. OptEase filter has a better infitration capabillity due to its diamond shape. OptEase filters will hjave more IVC occlusions as a complication.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Optease IVC filters

IVC filters will be implemented and evaluated for retrieval after 2-3 weeks.

DEVICE

Gunter-Tulip IVC filters

IVC filters will be implemented and evaluated for retrieval after 2-3 weeks.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sheba Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Uri Rimon, MD · Sheba Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-03-31
Primary Completion
2009-03-31
Completion
2009-03-31

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00588757 on ClinicalTrials.gov