Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms: Endo vs. Surgery

NCT00577616 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 107

Last updated 2014-10-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this multicenter randomized trial is to compare the endovascular repair versus conventional repair for ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms observed on CT scan in stable patients with suitable anatomy. The main awaited result is the significant reduction of the mortality of the conventional repair.

Conditions

  • Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Endovascular repair

Endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pascal Desgranges, PUPH · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-12-31
Primary Completion
2013-02-28
Completion
2014-02-28

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00577616 on ClinicalTrials.gov