MedTrace Logo

3D-Conformal Radiation vs Helical Tomotherapy in Prostate Cancer

NCT00326638 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72

Last updated 2020-04-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study we are comparing two forms of radiotherapy. This study is being done because it is not clear at present time whether intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce side effects of radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy (called 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy).

Conditions

Interventions

RADIATION

Arm B: Helical Tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

IMRT using Helical Tomotherapy\* 7800 cGY/39 Fractions once daily Monday to Friday for 8 weeks * Initial IMRT to Nodes/Prostate + Seminal Vesicles 4,600 cGy/23 * Boost IMRT to Prostate 3,200 cGy/16

OTHER

Arm A: 3D-Conformal Radiation

3DCRT 7800 cGY/39 Fractions/ STD Technique\* once daily Monday to Friday for 8 weeks * Initial 4F 3DCRT to Nodes/ Prostate + Seminal Vesicles 4,600 cGy/23 * Boost 6 F 3DCRT to Prostate 3,200 cGy/16

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shawn Malone, MD · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-03-31
Primary Completion
2015-01-31
Completion
2020-06-30

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00326638 on ClinicalTrials.gov