MedTrace Logo

Conventional Versus Automated Measurement of Blood Pressure in the Office (The CAMBO Study)

NCT00325832 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 750

Last updated 2010-08-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To determine if the use of automated office blood pressure readings can improve management of systolic hypertension in routine clinical practice. Automated office SBP recordings in routine clinical practice using the BpTRU device will reflect more accurately the mean awake ambulatory systolic BP than will manual BP readings taken with conventional mercury sphygmomanometry. This should lead to improvements in the management of systolic hypertension with optimization of drug therapy in practices using the BpTRU device.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

BpTRU

DEVICE

Conventional mercury sphygmomanometry

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

    collaborator OTHER

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Martin Myers, MD · Sunnybrook Medical Sciences Centre

  • Sheldon Tobe, MD · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-01-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00325832 on ClinicalTrials.gov