MedTrace Logo

Comparing Clinical Outcome of 2 Different Total Knee Prostheses: Nexgen LPS-Flex Versus AGC

NCT00294528 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2006-02-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A randomized blinded study is conducted comparing 2 different knee prostheses. Range of motion (ROM), pain, feel of prosthesis, satisfaction and ability to do daily activities are registered at intervals up to one year postop, where patients are informed on which prosthesis they received.

We want to:

* determine whether an increased ROM is achieved with a high-flex knee compared to a standard knee
* and if so, does it matter

Conditions

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

DEVICE

Nexgen LPS-flex and AGC

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hvidovre University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Henrik Husted, consultant · head of arthroplasty section

  • Kristian Stahl Otte, consultant · arthroplasty section

  • Gitte Holm, RN · Head nurse of arthroplasty section

  • Helle Krogshøj Hansen, RN · nurse

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2004-01-31
Completion
2010-01-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00294528 on ClinicalTrials.gov