Seldinger Technique Versus Venous Cut-Down for Placement of Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports
NCT00272623 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 152
Last updated 2009-06-03
Summary
Since the first placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) by Niederhuber et al in 1982 its application to provide long-term central venous access has dramatically increased. These systems have dramatically simplified the administration of chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition as well as the repetitive collection of blood samples.
Initial retrospective studies have focused on the complications associated with different implantation techniques. Subsequently, major attention has been payed to the comparison of distinct types of TIVAPs. To date a variety of approved port systems are available. These devices can be either implanted using the Seldinger technique or by venous cut-down of the cephalic vein Despite the global use of these established implantation procedures prospective, randomized trials directly comparing these two approaches are still lacking. So, the choice, which technique to use is left to the surgeon's preference.
The aim of this study is to directly compare the Seldinger technique versus cephalic vein cut down for placement of TIVAPs in respect of implantation success rate, operation time and perioperative morbidity.
Conditions
- Catheters, Indwelling
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Seldinger technique or venous cut-down for port placement
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Zurich
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Markus Weber, MD · Dept. of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2008-10-31
- Completion
- 2008-10-31
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Power Injectable Versus a Non-Power Injectable, Upper Arm, TIVAD for Chemotherapy
NCT02282449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Success Rate Of Cannulation Between The Accuvein Apparatus And Standard Technique
NCT01042613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fixing the Short Stay Central Venous Catheter: Comparison of Two Techniques
NCT02932800 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Central Line Placement-EVALUATION OF LINE DEPTH AS A FACTOR IN NEED FOR LINE REPLACEMENT SECONDARY TO MALPOSITION
NCT02602665 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Long Peripheral Catheter Versus Accelerated Seldinger Technique Long Peripheral Catheter in Difficult IV Access Patients
NCT07005310 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Length Catheters vs Long Catheters in Peripheral Vein Cannulation.
NCT01917253 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02975622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Surgical, Modified Seldinger's and US Techniques for Jugular Central Line Insertion in Infants
NCT06862492 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Versus Jugular Central Venous Catheterization
NCT02624323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Central Venous Catheterization Techniques in Neonates
NCT02688595 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maintenance Optimization of the Fully Implanted Venous Catheter
NCT05411666 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Correct Tip Position of Central Venous Catheters
NCT05176886 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Internal Jugular Vein Versus Axillary Vein for Implantable Ports
NCT03512899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Technique
NCT04218643 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
PIcc Cost EffectiveneSS and Safety of Infusional Therapy
NCT03392831 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tablet-guided Versus Freehand (Tab-Guide) Ventriculostomy : Study Protocol to the Test Accuracy of Ventriculostomy in a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02048553 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Syringe Free" Long-Axis In-Plane vs. Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Central Venous Catheter Placement
NCT04684069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Bevel Direction of Puncture Needle on Success Rate and Complications During Central Venous Catheterization
NCT01003366 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wire-in-needle vs. Traditional Technique for Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Placement
NCT05452590 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Central Vein Stenosis Due to Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Subclavian Compared to Jugular Vein
NCT04871568 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Virtual Reality With Ultrasound Versus Ultrasound For Central Line Insertion
NCT01877031 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Study of CVC Diagnosis Via Ultrasound in Children
NCT02178423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Central Venous Catheter vs Midline in Difficulty Access Patient - Pilot Trial
NCT06719869 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini-midline and the Peripheral Intravenous Catheter
NCT06290284 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Washington Study of AxoTrack-Guided Central Venous Cannulation
NCT03027323 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA