MedTrace Logo

Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

NCT00238823 · Status: TERMINATED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2007-05-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. It is also to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another and to describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA.

Conditions

  • Congenital Disorders

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Margaret Strieper, DO · Sibley Heart Center

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2004-01-31
Completion
2004-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00238823 on ClinicalTrials.gov