CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

NCT00213681 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2026-04-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure more rapidly improves ventilation than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute pulmonary edema. CPAP is delivered via a simple device connected to oxygen.

Conditions

  • Severe Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Interventions

DEVICE

Boussignac CPAP - bilevel ventilation support

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Rouen

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Fabienne MORITZ, MD · University Hospital, Rouen

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2002-11-30
Primary Completion
2005-12-28
Completion
2005-12-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00213681 on ClinicalTrials.gov