A Randomized, Comparative Trial of Zidovudine (AZT) Versus 2',3'-Didehydro-3'-Deoxythymidine (Stavudine; d4T) in Children With HIV Infection

NCT00000789 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 230

Last updated 2021-11-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

PRIMARY: To compare the relative safety and tolerance of oral zidovudine (AZT) versus oral stavudine (d4T) in symptomatic HIV-infected children.

SECONDARY: To compare the clinical, virologic, and immunologic responses between the two treatment groups, and to obtain pharmacokinetic data for both drugs.

At present, AZT is considered the drug of choice for initial treatment of most children with HIV infection, although disease progression or drug intolerance is associated with its long-term use. In preliminary studies in children, d4T, another HIV inhibitor, has been well tolerated, although an optimum dose has not been determined.

Conditions

  • HIV Infections

Interventions

DRUG

Stavudine

DRUG

Zidovudine

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Glaxo Wellcome

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

    lead NIH

Principal Investigators

  • Kline M

  • Van Dyke R

Study Design

Purpose
TREATMENT
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
3 Months
Max Age
6 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Completion
1998-07-31

Countries

  • United States
  • Puerto Rico

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00000789 on ClinicalTrials.gov