Thread-Embedding Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

NCT07789418 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2026-08-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compared thread-embedding acupuncture with electroacupuncture for adults with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electrodiagnosis. Eighty participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either thread-embedding acupuncture or electroacupuncture. Both groups also received standard care, including lifestyle modification, nocturnal wrist splinting, nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol as needed. Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, whereas electroacupuncture was administered 10 times over the same period. Participants were assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4. The primary outcome was the change in paresthesia intensity from baseline to week 4, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, symptom severity, functional status, paracetamol use, and adverse events.

Conditions

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Thread-Embedding Acupuncture

Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, at baseline and week 1. Sterile polydioxanone thread-embedding needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5. The device consisted of a sterile 31-G stainless-steel cannula with a 30-mm needle shaft and a 30-mm polydioxanone thread folded in half, corresponding to an embedded thread length of approximately 15 mm. The thread was placed within the muscle layer and left in situ after withdrawal of the needle.

PROCEDURE

Electroacupuncture

Electroacupuncture was administered once daily, five times per week for two weeks, for a total of 10 sessions. Sterile disposable needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5. Continuous biphasic rectangular pulses with alternating frequencies of 2/100 Hz every 3 seconds and a pulse width of 0.2 ms were delivered for 20 minutes. Stimulation intensity was adjusted within 2-5 mA according to participant tolerance.

OTHER

Standard Care

Both treatment groups received standard care throughout the four-week study period, including lifestyle modification to avoid wrist flexion and strain, nocturnal wrist splinting, daily nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol 500 mg as needed for intolerable pain with a minimum four-hour interval between doses.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hoang Binh Trading Services Co., Ltd

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Minh-Man P Bui, PhD · University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-21
Primary Completion
2025-05-26
Completion
2025-05-26

Countries

  • Vietnam

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07789418 on ClinicalTrials.gov