Safety and Efficacy of the Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System in Car Diogenic Shock: A Prospective, Multicenter , Single-Arm Study
NCT07769528 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-08-18
Summary
Study Title: Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Clinical Study Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of temporary mechanical circulatory support and bridge therapy with an extracorporeal ventricular assist system in patients with cardiogenic shock or weaning failure from cardiopulmonary bypass, and to comprehensively assess the device, pump head, cannulae and tubing.
Pilot Phase: Clinical validation of Class III medical device. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm target-value design. Sample Size: 40 patients. Primary Endpoint: Success rate of mechanical circulatory support.
Secondary Endpoints:
30-day survival after transition to long-term therapy (VAD/transplant); 30-day cardiovascular mortality after device explantation; MACCE incidence; Mean support duration; Incidence of bleeding, thrombosis, hematologic events, acute renal/hepatic dysfunction, infection; Hemodynamic trends during support; Changes in SCr, BUN, ALT, TBIL at use, discharge and 30 days post-explantation vs baseline; Device satisfaction. Follow-up: Within 6 hours of initiation, during support, 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days post-explantation/transition, and at discharge.
All clinical data were collected, managed and analyzed by an independent data and statistical center and clinical monitoring unit to support safety/efficacy evaluation and market approval.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
EVAS Treatment
Using interventional implantation of blood conduits into the left cardiac system, an extracorporeal pump shunts blood to the arterial system to partially or fully substitute cardiac pumping function and sustain systemic circulation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-23
- Primary Completion
- 2028-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Temporary Epicardial Cardiac Resynchronisation.
NCT01027299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Augmented Pacing for Shock in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit
NCT06713668 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Interventional Left Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
NCT06127927 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ventricular Pace Suppression Study
NCT01053832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Echocardiographic Assessment of Epicardial Pacing After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
NCT02842762 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SyncAV Study: Investigation of the Efficacy of the SyncAV Fusion Pacing Algorithm on Exercise
NCT03768804 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Registry for Cardiogenic Shock: Utility and Efficacy of Device Therapy
NCT02790242 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01294527 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diastolic Ventricular Interaction and the Effects of Biventricular Pacing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00698074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Assess Safety and Probable Benefit of the EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
NCT00583661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Effects of LBBP Versus BVP for CRT
NCT04505384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Atrioventricular Delay Optimization on Ventricular Function in Conduction System Pacing
NCT07624552 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Achieving Conduction System Activation With Leadless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing
NCT05659680 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
BiventRicular Pacing in prolongEd Atrio-Ventricular intervaL: the REAL-CRT Study
NCT02150538 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LVSP Based CRT vs. RVAP Based CRT
NCT05985408 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Electrical and Hemodynamic Effects of Different Pacing Strategies in CRT Candidates
NCT07032064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints
NCT07684547 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Biventricular Pacing In Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Cardiovascular Surgery
NCT00321295 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Corheart 6 LVAS LTFU
NCT05928273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Upgrading From Right Ventricular Pacing to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Comparison With Dual-Chamber Defibrillator
NCT07077928 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pacemaker Upgrade to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Dependant Upon Right Ventricular Pacing
NCT01652248 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Synchronized Cardiac Assist for Cardiogenic Shock
NCT02697006 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
NCT00700700 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Permanent Conduction System Pacing Versus Atrioventricular Management for Patients With Wide QRS and Patent AV Conduction
NCT07585799 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA