Transurethral Thermodilatation vs. Prostatic Urethral Lift for Moderate-to-Severe BPH

NCT07759752 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2026-08-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This clinical trial aims to determine whether Prolieve® (microwave with balloon dilation) is as effective as UroLift® (prostate implants) for treating moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms in men aged 50-80 with enlarged prostates (BPH) who have failed oral medications.

The main questions are:

1. Is Prolieve non-inferior to UroLift in improving IPSS symptom scores at 3 months?
2. Does Prolieve cause less pain and avoid the need for injected anaesthesia?

Researchers will compare Prolieve (LA urethral gel only, no injections) against UroLift (LA urethral gel with or without local anaesthetic injection) to see if Prolieve offers similar relief with better tolerability.

Participants will stop their BPH medications for 2-4 weeks, undergo one of the two same-day office procedures, and attend follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months for symptom scores, flow tests, and bladder scans.

Conditions

  • BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
  • LUTS(Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms)

Interventions

DEVICE

Prolieve Transurethral Thermodilatation System

Prolieve is a minimally invasive, FDA-approved thermotherapy device for BPH. It delivers simultaneous microwave energy (≤50 W) and 46 French balloon dilatation to the prostatic urethra for 45 minutes. It is performed under intraurethral lidocaine gel only-no injected anaesthesia, no sedation, and no operating theatre. Catheter is removed immediately post-procedure; same-day discharge.

DEVICE

UroLift Prostatic Urethral Lift System

UroLift is a minimally invasive, FDA-cleared device for BPH. It deploys 4-6 permanent nitinol implants under cystoscopic guidance to mechanically retract and hold open the obstructing prostatic lobes, widening the urethra without tissue ablation. Performed with topical intraurethral lidocaine gel, with or without periprostatic nerve block per site practice. No routine post-procedural catheterisation; same-day discharge.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The University of Hong Kong

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shung Lai John Leung, MBBS, FRCSEd, FCSHK, FHKAM · The University of Hong Kong, Hospital Authority

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-08-06
Primary Completion
2029-08-05
Completion
2029-11-05
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Hong Kong

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07759752 on ClinicalTrials.gov