Early Versus Late Intervention in Maxillofacial Trauma

NCT07749729 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2026-08-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Maxillofacial trauma represents a significant clinical challenge requiring timely surgical management. This prospective study aims to compare early versus delayed intervention in patients with maxillofacial trauma and evaluate the effects of treatment timing on functional, esthetic, and radiological outcomes.

Conditions

  • Maxillofacial Trauma

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Timing of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF)

Comparison of early versus delayed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with maxillofacial trauma. Early intervention is defined as surgical management performed within 72 hours after injury, while delayed intervention is defined as surgical management performed more than 72 hours after injury. The study evaluates the impact of the timing of surgical intervention on clinical, functional, radiological, and aesthetic outcomes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Haifa Mohammed Sharaf-Aldeen

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-02-01
Primary Completion
2026-03-21
Completion
2026-03-21

Countries

  • Yemen

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07749729 on ClinicalTrials.gov