MedTrace Logo

A Comparative Usability Study of Two Total Body Skin Imaging Systems

NCT07740642 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2026-08-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to generate evidence on patient and dermatologist perspectives regarding two total body photography systems. Patient and clinician preferences represent key factors in healthcare decision-making. The investigation will also provide data on the time efficiency of each system in a real-world setting.

Conditions

  • Melanoma (Skin Cancer)

Interventions

DEVICE

Deviskan

Autonomous total body photography and dermoscopic imaging system Deviskan, Softwares: Devisoft, Devisual, Deviplatform, (Dermavision Solutions S. L., Figueres, Catalonia, Spain)

DEVICE

Vectra WB360

3D total body photography imaging system Vectra WB360, digital dermoscopic camera VISIOMED D200evo dermatoscope, DermaGraphix IntelliStudio, (Canfield Scientific Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey, USA)

OTHER

Standard-of-care clinical examinations

Active control with standard-of-care clinical examinations by experienced dermatologists.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-08-03
Primary Completion
2026-09-30
Completion
2026-09-30

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07740642 on ClinicalTrials.gov