Comparison Between Two Hysteroscopic Biopsy Techniques in the Outpatient Setting for Sampling Hypotrophic or Atrophic Endometrium: 'Rail Biopsy' Versus 'Chip Biopsy'

NCT07675317 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 156

Last updated 2026-06-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy is one of the most common procedures in gynecology. For patients with atrophic or hypotrophic endometrium, typical of menopausal women, the "chip biopsy" technique is often preferred as it provides adequate tissue samples for accurate histological examination. Recently, the "rail biopsy" technique has also been adopted at IRCCS AOUBO for biopsies in similar cases. Currently, the choice between these techniques depends largely on operator preference and experience, as there is no strong evidence favoring one over the other in terms of efficacy, safety, or tolerability.

This observational, single-center, cross-sectional, prospective, non-profit study aims to compare the procedure duration of "chip biopsy" versus "rail biopsy" in patients requiring endometrial biopsy of atrophic or hypotrophic endometrium. The study is expected to last approximately 14 months. Approximately 156 patients will be enrolled.

Conditions

  • Atrophic or Hypotrophic Endometrium

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
48 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-04
Primary Completion
2026-09-30
Completion
2026-11-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07675317 on ClinicalTrials.gov