General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in RIRS

NCT07664384 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 252

Last updated 2026-08-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The impact of anesthesia type on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. Several studies have compared general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in endourological procedures, with conflicting results regarding operative time, complication rates, and stone-free outcomes. Importantly, the interaction between anesthesia type and stone characteristics-particularly stone size-has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing RIRS at Qena University Hospital, with particular emphasis on the effect of stone size stratification on perioperative outcomes.

Conditions

  • Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • South Valley University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-04-01
Primary Completion
2025-02-01
Completion
2025-02-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07664384 on ClinicalTrials.gov