Safety and Efficacy of NOM and OPFS Versus RO for dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-Mutated Gastrointestinal Cancers
NCT07642323 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2026-06-11
Summary
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Non-Operative Management (NOM) and Organ Preservation First Strategy (OPFS) compared with Radical Operation (RO) in patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers.
Background \& Design:
With the remarkable efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal tumors, organ preservation has become a promising alternative to highly invasive surgeries. The NOR-MP trial is a single-center, bidirectional registry study consisting of two parts: a retrospective cohort study and a prospective observational registry.
Intervention Group (NOM/OPFS): Patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy will undergo a "Watch \& Wait" (W\&W) strategy. Patients with near-cCR or non-cCR who are eligible for organ preservation will undergo local excision (LE) or endoscopic resection (including ESD or EMR).
Comparison Group (Radical Operation): Patients who undergo standard radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
The study aims to determine whether an organ-preserving approach can achieve comparable oncological outcomes and safety profiles while significantly improving patients' quality of life compared to radical surgery.
Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Cancers
- Gastrointestinal Cancers - Stomach
- Gastrointestinal Cancers - Colorectal
- Gastrointestinal Cancers - Anus
Interventions
- OTHER
-
NOM/OPFS
Patients eligible for and consenting to NOM or OPFS. This includes the W\&W strategy for those achieving cCR/near-cCR, and LE or endoscopic resection (ESD/EMR) for those with near-cCR or non-cCR.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-15
- Primary Completion
- 2027-01-15
- Completion
- 2030-01-15
More Related Trials
-
the Optimal Surveillance Frequency for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer
NCT05465993 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Laparoscopic With Open Distal Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT02404753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Function Preserving Gastrectomy for T1/2 Gastric Cancer Patients
NCT03874871 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Feasibility and Safety of Hybrid Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer
NCT04048421 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Proximal Gastrectomy Anterior Anastomosis With Pyloroplasty Versus Esophagogastric Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer
NCT05514769 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Compared to Robotic Assisted Surgery for Median Rectal Cancer
NCT06454201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Observational Study to Compare Effectiveness and Safety of the Surgeries in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT03428074 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Liquid Biopsy in Monitoring the Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Operation in Gastric Cancer
NCT03957564 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Total/Subtotal Colectomy in Ovarian Cancer
NCT02595021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in the Treatment of Gastric and Rectal Cancer
NCT02955173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Double Tract Anastomosis and Esophagogastrostomy After Radical Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT03613142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Local Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients
NCT03564834 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Proximal Gastrectomy vs Total Gastrectomy in Locally Advanced Upper Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT06597227 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Robotic Surgery With Transrectal Resection Specimens (NOSES-IV) and Traditional Assisted Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of High Rectal and Sigmoid Colon Cancer
NCT06906952 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Total Robotic Versus Robotic Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT04795063 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Outside the Primary Registered Medical Institution
NCT04834661 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Surgery VS Laparoscopic Surgery + Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for T4 Tumor of the Colon Cancer
NCT02777437 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Trans-Pacific Multicenter Collaborative Study of Minimally Invasive Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
NCT05205343 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Impact of the Techniques for Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis on Outcome in Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy
NCT01242124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes Between Upfront Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgery in Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer
NCT06673472 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
OGT-assisted Overlap Esophagojejunostomy Versus Traditional Overlap Method
NCT05450835 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Different Body Mass Index for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06396975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Relationship Between Perioperative Treatment Efficacy and The Tumor Microenvironment for Locally Advanced Resectable Gastric Cancer.
NCT04850729 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Application of a New Surgical Technique in Proximal Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06679244 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA