SAPI vs SASI in the Management of Morbid Obesity
NCT07618598 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68
Last updated 2026-06-03
Summary
Study Design A single-center cohort study combining prospective and retrospective data collection was conducted. The prospective arm enrolled consecutively admitted patients, while the retrospective arm analyzed previously recorded cases meeting identical eligibility criteria.
Study Setting and Population
The study was performed at the General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University. It included adults aged 18-65 years with morbid obesity eligible for bariatric surgery:
* Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m² with obesity-related comorbidities, or
* BMI 30-34.9 kg/m² with at least one major comorbidity \[e.g., type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HTN), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis (OA), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)\] Study Period
* Prospective: September 2021 - September 2023
* Retrospective: January 2017 - August 2021 Eligibility Criteria Included patients were American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I-III and had failed structured non-surgical weight management for ≥6 months.
Exclusion criteria included endocrine obesity, prior bariatric surgery, severe psychiatric or cognitive disorders, substance abuse, pregnancy, and previous major upper abdominal surgery.
Sample Size
Sample size was calculated based on cost difference between SASI and SAPI procedures using a two-sample means formula. A clinically relevant difference of 500 USD and SD of 700 USD were assumed, yielding:
* Total of 62 patients in the entire cohort
* Adjusted for 10% attrition → 70 total patients Final allocation was approximately 2:1 single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) : single anastomosis plication ileal bypass (SAPI), reflecting real-world recruitment rather than randomization.
Group Allocation Non-randomized assignment was used. Prospective allocation involved shared decision-making within a multidisciplinary team, while retrospective allocation was based on prior surgical records. Influencing factors included cost, availability, insurance, and patient preference.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Methods Preoperative Assessment
Comprehensive evaluation included:
* Detailed medical history and comorbidity assessment
* Nutritional deficiency screening and correction
* Anthropometric measurements
* Laboratory tests
* Imaging (as indicated) Validated Questionnaires
* Physical activity: using The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA)
* Eating behavior: Self-Regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire (SREB-Q) and The Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26)
* Sleep quality: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
* Socioeconomic status: Fahmy \& El-Sherbini scale
* Quality of life (QoL): The Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (MA-QoL II)
Surgical Procedures
Two laparoscopic techniques were performed:
SASI
* Sleeve gastrectomy over 36-Fr bougie
* 300 cm ileal loop anastomosed to gastric antrum
* Stapled side-to-side stapled gastroileal anastomosis SAPI
* Same, but gastric devascularization and plication over a 36-Fr bougie rather than sleeve gastrectomy Both procedures included leak testing, drain placement, and dual-outlet gastric configuration.
Postoperative Management
Standardized enhanced recovery protocol:
* Early mobilization and VTE prophylaxis
* Proton pump inhibitors and analgesia
* Gradual oral intake from postoperative day 1
* Imaging and lab assessment when indicated
* Early discharge if stable
Cost Analysis
A micro-costing approach was used, including:
* Primary costs: technology, personnel, instruments, disposables, hospitalization, follow-up, supplements
* Secondary costs: readmissions and re-interventions Cost components were calculated using standardized formulas for each item Total cost = Primary + Secondary costs
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using:
* Cost-effectiveness ratios (CER)
* Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
* Outcomes included percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complication rates, readmission, comorbidity remission, and The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).
Follow-Up and Outcomes
Follow-up included:
* Weekly (1st month), biweekly (next 2 months), then quarterly (up to 1 year)
* Assessment of weight loss, comorbidities, complications, and QoL
Primary outcome:
• Total cost difference between SASI and SAPI
Secondary outcomes:
* Operative time, length of hospital stay, complications
* %EWL, comorbidity remission
* QoL (MA-QoL II, BAROS)
Statistical Analysis
Performed using SPSS v26:
* Normality: Shapiro-Wilk test
* Continuous data: t-test or Mann-Whitney U
* Categorical data: Chi-square or Fisher's test
* Regression: linear and logistic models
* Significance set at p \< 0.05.
Conditions
- Morbid Obesity Requiring Bariatric Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass Procedure
Participants undergo laparoscopic SASI bariatric surgery consisting of sleeve gastrectomy followed by a single omega-loop gastroileal anastomosis. An isoperistaltic ileal limb is measured 300 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. A stapled side-to-side gastroileal anastomosis is created, and the staple entry site is closed with barbed sutures. Standard leak testing and drain placement are performed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Single Anastomosis Plication Ileal (SAPI) Bypass Procedure
Participants undergo laparoscopic SAPI bariatric surgery involving gastric plication followed by a single omega-loop gastroileal anastomosis. An isoperistaltic ileal limb is measured 300 cm from the ileocecal valve. A stapled side-to-side anastomosis is performed between the gastric antrum and ileal loop, with closure of the enterotomy using barbed sutures. Leak testing and drain placement are routinely performed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-09-11
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-11
- Completion
- 2025-03-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SASI Compared with RYGB in the Treatment of Obesity and Related Metabolic Diseases
NCT06598267 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-randomized Prospective Comparison Between SASI Bipartition and RYGB
NCT04469712 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Efficacy of SASI Bypass for Type-2 Diabetic Obese Patients
NCT02680873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Jejuno-ileal Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass
NCT06530212 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SAS-J Compared to OAGB and LSG as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity
NCT03821688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Exploring the Efficacy of Single-stage Stapled Conversion of Gastric Bypass to Sleeve Gastrectomy, More Leak?
NCT07038148 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Midterm Follow up Outcomes of (SASJ) in Management of Morbid Obesity
NCT07087535 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal (SAS-J) Bypass
NCT02870530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tailored Stapled SADI-S: Initial Report and Preliminary Results
NCT07289555 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Anastomosis Plication Ileal Bypass for Morbid Obesity
NCT03428386 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass as a Revisional Bariatric Procedure
NCT05269420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Effect Of Mini-gastric Bypass and Single Anastmosis Sleeve Jujenal Bypass On Levels Of GLP-1, GIP, PYY, Insulin Resistance and Type II DM Resolution
NCT07475143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT05145205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Anastomosis Duodenal Ileal Bypass (SADI) for Sleeve Revision
NCT04165694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparative Study of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus MGB and SASI Bypass , Randomized Study
NCT03394157 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Loop Bipartition (Short-term Outcomes)
NCT03745365 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Anastomosis Sleeve Iejenal Bypass in Obese Patient With Hiatus Hernia
NCT04823767 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Patients, Retrospective Study.
NCT04967053 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Binge Eating, Depression and Anxiety Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass: A Cohort Study
NCT07600411 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): A Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02792166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Non-inferiority of the Robotic Approach Over the Laparoscopic Approach in Patients Who Are Candidates for Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S)
NCT06021873 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus "Single Loop" Bypass After Parietal Gastrectomy
NCT07115836 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Preoperative Ultrasound as a Predictor for Difficulty in Bariatric Surgery
NCT03486691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Sleeve Pouch Versus Relatively Wide Pouch With Plication
NCT04144361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Short Term Follow up
NCT03465956 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA