HoLEP-ThuLEP - Comparing Lasers for BPH Surgery
NCT07565961 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2026-05-07
Summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a very common condition in older men. As the prostate enlarges, it can press on the urethra and make urination difficult. Typical symptoms include a weak urinary stream, frequent urination, getting up at night to urinate, and a feeling that the bladder is not fully empty. When medication is no longer sufficient, surgical removal of the inner part of the prostate ("enucleation") is the recommended treatment.
Two modern laser techniques are used for this operation. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is currently considered the reference standard, with very good long-term results and a low rate of re-operations. Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP) using a pulsed thulium laser is a newer alternative. Because the laser energy is delivered in short pulses, ThuLEP may allow more precise tissue cutting and better control of bleeding during surgery.
So far, only limited high-quality randomized data directly compare the two techniques, particularly for patient-reported outcomes such as urinary symptoms, continence, and erectile function.
Purpose of the study The HoT-Trial investigates whether ThuLEP is as effective as HoLEP for men who need surgery for an enlarged prostate, and whether there are differences in recovery, complication rates, urinary symptoms, continence, and erectile function after surgery.
Research question Does ThuLEP lead to a similar improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as HoLEP 12 months after surgery, measured by the change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)?
How the study works A total of 150 men aged 18 years or older with clinically relevant BPH, an IPSS of 8 or higher, a prostate volume above 40 ml, and an indication for surgery will take part. Each participant will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either ThuLEP or HoLEP. Participants are blinded to the assigned technique (single-blind design). Both procedures are established, guideline-recommended treatments; taking part in the study does not add any risks beyond standard care.
Before surgery, participants complete standardized questionnaires (IPSS, ICIQ-SF, IIEF) and undergo uroflowmetry and residual urine measurement. Surgery is performed according to randomization. Participants are then followed up in the urology outpatient clinic at discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The same measurements and questionnaires are repeated at each visit.
Primary outcome Change in IPSS from baseline to 12 months after surgery.
Secondary outcomes Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine; continence (ICIQ-SF) and erectile function (IIEF); operative time, laser time, blood loss, transfusion rate; catheter indwelling time and length of hospital stay; peri- and postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification; and the rate of re-intervention or re-catheterization within 12 months.
Setting and timeline The study is conducted as a single-center trial at the Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany. Recruitment runs for approximately two years, with up to 12 months of follow-up per participant. The total study period is planned from April 2026 to April 2029.
By directly comparing the two laser enucleation techniques in a randomized setting, the HoT-Trial aims to help patients and physicians choose the most suitable surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Conditions
- BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP)
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostatic adenoma with a pulsed thulium laser; performed in arm 1
- PROCEDURE
-
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostatic adenoma with a holmium:YAG laser; performed in arm 2
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Yannic Volz, PD Dr. med. · LMU University Hospital
-
Patrick Keller, PD Dr. med. · LMU University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-30
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)
NCT04807296 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes and Complications of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Expert Hands
NCT03583034 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Feasibility and Utility of a Prehabilitation Program for Use in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Who Have Elected to Undergo Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
NCT07552961 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transient Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
NCT01108367 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Study of the Beacon Platform for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
NCT06668142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial of Irritative Symptoms Severity Assessment After (HoLEP) Versus ThuFLEP
NCT04342533 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Holmium Laser Enucleation and Thulium Laser Enucleation on Continence, Urethral Stricture, and Sexual Function in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT07334730 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Predictors of Trifecta Achievement After HoLEP
NCT07429994 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH
NCT03230721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Safety and Effectiveness of High Versus Low Power HOLEP
NCT05678452 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HoLEP Vs BPEP for Large Prostatic Adenoma
NCT04275076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retrospective Review a Comprehensive Case Database of HoLEP Procedure Performed by a Single Surgeon
NCT01604148 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HoLEP vs. Greenlight 532nm-laser PVEP vs. Bipolar TURP in Management of Moderate/ Large BPH
NCT02332538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of HoLEP vs. PVP in Treating BPH in Patients With Bleeding Tendency
NCT02293759 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Holmium Laser Ablation of the Prostate (HoLAP) Versus KTP Laser Vaporization of the Prostate
NCT00169767 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
En-bloc With Early Apical Release Versus Lobe-by-lobe LASER Enucleation of the Prostate
NCT07014969 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HoLEP vs BPRP in the Management of a Large Volume (> 80 gm) Symptomatic BPH
NCT04935151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate.
NCT03916536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SOLTIVE™ Laser Enucleation for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT04826887 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HoLEP: Learning Curve Analysis and Comparison With TURP
NCT06849089 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Moses Assisted Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
NCT06649357 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Slim Sheath 22F Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs 26 F Sheath HoLEP for BPH: RCT
NCT06546865 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Dysuria and Irritative Symptoms After HoLEP: a Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Alpha-Blocker Therapy
NCT06865430 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HoLEP in Management of BPH Patients With Predominant Voiding vs Storage LUTS: A Comparative Retrospective Study
NCT04178811 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HoLEP vs mTURP in Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT04561505 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA