Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials
NCT07565558 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-05-04
Summary
Tooth extraction is among the most common dental treatments. The procedure results in the formation of a bone defect. During the healing phase, the vertical and horizontal diameters of the alveolar ridge decrease, which has a negative impact on planned prosthetic or implantoprosthetic therapies.
The socket preservation technique involves filling the socket with an augmentation biomaterial to reduce vertical and horizontal alveolar atrophy. This prospective clinical study compares two biomaterials suitable for alveolar ridge preservation: xenogeneic versus allogeneic. Histological analysis and radiographic parameters related to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge and bone optical density are evaluated during a 180-day follow-up period.
Conditions
- Socket Preservation
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation
- Xenograft
- Allograft
- Extraction Socket Healing
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Socket preservation with xenograft
Minimally invasive tooth extraction with separation is performed. The wound is debrided and the socket is filled with xenogeneic biomaterial (Geistlich Bio-Oss®, cortico-cancellous bone powder, 0.25-1 mm granules) up to the alveolar crest. This is then covered with a Geistlich Bio-Gide® collagen membrane and sutured with 4-0 nylon sutures. An open healing protocol is utilised. Standardised postoperative care, antibiotics and follow-up are provided. CBCT scans with a 5x5 cm field of view are performed preoperatively, and again after 7-10 days and after 180 days of treatment.
- PROCEDURE
-
Socket preservation with allograft
Minimally invasive tooth extraction with separation is performed. The wound is debrided and the socket is filled with allogeneic biomaterial (BIOBank®, cortico-cancellous bone powder, 0.5 mm granules) up to the alveolar crest. This is then covered with a Geistlich Bio-Gide® collagen membrane and sutured with 4-0 nylon sutures. An open healing protocol is utilised. Standardised postoperative care, antibiotics and follow-up are provided. CBCT scans with a 5x5 cm field of view are performed preoperatively, and again after 7-10 days and after 180 days of treatment.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Silesia
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-05
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-27
- Completion
- 2026-03-27
Countries
- Poland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Composite Plug Vs D-PTFE Membrane in Socket Preservation
NCT06315413 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The "One-piece" Autologous Tuberosity Graft
NCT04356001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Different Biomaterials to Preserve Bone After Tooth Extraction
NCT07394738 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Analysis of 2 Bone Graft Materials in Socket Preservation
NCT07344025 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Material's Histomorphometric Analysis In Socket Preservation
NCT06740110 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Xenograft as a Socket Preservation Material in Maxillary Posterior Teeth.
NCT07250256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sticky Bone vs Xenograft With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid in Socket Preservation
NCT06983015 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Customized Allogenic Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
NCT07419269 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Non-Setting Paste in Bone Defect Reconstruction
NCT07379008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Delayed Dental Implant Placement After Socket Preservation Using Injectable Bone Graft
NCT07373600 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microarchitecture of the Augmented Bone Following Sinus Elevation
NCT04136509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Amnion-chorion Membrane for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05592158 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid in Bone Regeneration
NCT07031895 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area
NCT04367766 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Xenograft and Posterior Mandibular Socket Filling
NCT02736773 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Autogenous Dentin Graft on Socket Preservation
NCT04131894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Site Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT05258019 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Hyaluronic Acid Effect on Xenogenic Bone Healing
NCT04377256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05572242 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Post Extraction Changes After Ridge Preservation Using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Vs Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft
NCT06318650 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration in Alveolar Socket
NCT05577663 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Alveolar Ridge Preservation on the Potential Need for Sinus Floor Elevation: A 10-year Retrospective Radiographical Study
NCT07526129 ·Status: RECRUITING