Comparative Evaluation of Optrell and Octaray Mapping Catheters for Conduction Block Confirmation and Voltage Assessment During Atrial Ablation

NCT07563257 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-06-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This prospective, single-center observational study aims to compare the clinical performance, workflow efficiency, and electrophysiological metrics of two commercially available, high-density multielectrode mapping catheters (Octaray and Optrell) in patients undergoing catheter ablation for complex atrial arrhythmias.

The primary focus is to determine if the real-time vector propagation capabilities of the Optrell catheter combined with V8 software can accurately confirm conduction block across linear ablation lesions without the need for full-chamber activation remapping, which is the current standard of care. A secondary focus will pair-compare the bipolar voltage amplitude distributions recorded by both catheters, given their differing electrode sizes and spacing.

Conditions

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Interventions

DEVICE

Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation Only

Comparison between two mapping catheters, Optrell vs Octaray, in the same patient

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Maxime Zabern

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Maxime Zabern, MD · Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-05-12
Primary Completion
2027-05-01
Completion
2028-05-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07563257 on ClinicalTrials.gov