Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children - Which One ?

NCT07558941 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2026-04-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary aim of this research is to compare the efficacy of conservative treatment versus surgical treatment for Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The comparison focuses on assessing differences in clinical outcomes functional recovery times, and complication rates between the two treatment groups.

Conditions

  • Humeral Fractures

Interventions

OTHER

Conservative treatment by casting

Closed reduction of Gartland type II supracondylar humeral fracture under appropriate analgesia or anesthesia, followed by immobilization using an above-elbow cast. Patients will undergo regular clinical and radiographic follow-up to monitor fracture alignment, healing, and functional recovery.

PROCEDURE

surgical treatment via percutaneous pinning UGA

surgical treatment vis Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning under general anesthesia. Postoperative care includes clinical and radiographic follow-up to assess fracture healing, alignment, and potential complications.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-06-01
Primary Completion
2028-06-01
Completion
2028-08-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07558941 on ClinicalTrials.gov