Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pre-Diagnosis GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Post-Cancer Mortality in Adults With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT07513259)
NCT ID: NCT07513259
Last Updated: 2026-08-17
Results Overview
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Target enrollment
203424 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 months
Results posted on
2026-08-17
Participant Flow
Participants were retrospectively identified from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network using de-identified electronic health records. Eligible adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who initiated glucose-lowering therapy between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2025 and subsequently developed an obesity-associated cancer were included based on prespecified eligibility criteria.
Enrollment and Participant Flow counts reflect the unique participants in the overall study population, classified into two mutually exclusive cohorts according to pre-diagnosis GLP-1 RA use. Participants were counted once in the Participant Flow module. Comparator-specific propensity score-matched cohorts were defined separately for prespecified pairwise outcome analyses and are reported in the relevant Baseline Characteristics and Outcome Measures sections.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist before cancer diagnosis. This cohort served as the GLP-1 RA exposure cohort in the overall study population and represents the unique participants with pre-diagnosis GLP-1 receptor agonist use.
|
Usual Care Without GLP-1 RA
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions before cancer diagnosis. This cohort served as the non-GLP-1 RA comparator cohort in the overall study population. Participants could receive routine clinical care, including other non-GLP-1 RA glucose-lowering medications. This cohort represents the unique participants without pre-diagnosis GLP-1 receptor agonist use.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
27208
|
176216
|
|
Overall Study
Matched into Comparison 1 (GLP-1 RA Without SGLT2i vs SGLT2i)
|
12193
|
12193
|
|
Overall Study
Matched into Comparison 2 (GLP-1 RA Without DPP-4i vs DPP-4i)
|
11154
|
11154
|
|
Overall Study
Matched into Comparison 3 (GLP-1 RA Without Sulfonylureas vs Sulfonylureas)
|
14072
|
14072
|
|
Overall Study
Matched into Comparison 4 (GLP-1 RA Without Metformin vs Metformin)
|
9819
|
9819
|
|
Overall Study
Matched into Comparison 5 (GLP-1 RA vs Usual Care)
|
26433
|
26433
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
27208
|
176216
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12193 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12193 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
GLP-1 RA Without History of DPP-4i (Comparison 2)
n=11154 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no DPP-4 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 2.
|
DPP-4i (Comparison 2)
n=11154 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a DPP-4 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 2.
|
GLP-1 RA Without History of Sulfonylureas (Comparison 3)
n=14072 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no sulfonylurea prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 3.
|
Sulfonylureas (Comparison 3)
n=14072 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a sulfonylurea and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 3.
|
GLP-1 RA Without History of Metformin (Comparison 4)
n=9819 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no metformin prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 4.
|
Metformin (Comparison 4)
n=9819 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating metformin and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 4.
|
GLP-1 RA (Comparison 5)
n=26433 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist before cancer diagnosis. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 5.
|
Usual Care (Comparison 5)
n=26433 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions before cancer diagnosis; other non-GLP-1 RA diabetes management was permitted. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 5.
|
Total
n=147342 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years (Comparison 1)
|
4629 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4636 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
9265 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years (Comparison 1)
|
7564 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7557 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
15121 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
3272 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
3284 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
6556 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7882 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7870 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
15752 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5148 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5193 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
10341 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8924 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8879 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
17803 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4132 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4065 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8197 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5687 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5754 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
11441 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
12066 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
12085 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
24151 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
14367 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
14348 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
28715 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Age categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (Comparison 1)
|
3534 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
3508 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7042 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 1 · Hispanic or Latino
|
1007 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1024 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2031 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (Comparison 1)
|
8651 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
8679 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
17330 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported (Comparison 1)
|
8 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
6 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
14 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
3546 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
3534 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7080 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7605 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7615 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
15220 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
3 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
5 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
8 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
4205 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
4239 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
8444 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
9863 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
9827 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
19690 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
4 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
6 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
10 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
2484 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
2481 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
4965 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 1 · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9245 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
9251 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
18496 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7327 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7329 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
14656 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
8 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
9 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
17 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
6883 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
7109 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
13992 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
19532 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
19307 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
38839 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
0 Participants
Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
18 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
17 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
35 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Sex/gender categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed. A small number of participants in the source system export were not resolved into the displayed sex/gender strata and are therefore reported under "Unknown or Not Reported" so that category counts sum to the analyzed population.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 1 · Unknown or Not Reported
|
1941 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1918 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
3859 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 2 · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1023 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1012 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2035 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 2 · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8463 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8434 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
16897 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
HbA1c ≥7%
HbA1c ≥7% (Comparison 1)
|
7230 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7232 Participants
n=12193 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
14462 Participants
n=24386 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 2 · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1668 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1708 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
3376 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 3 · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1154 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1147 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2301 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 3 · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
10605 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
10638 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
21243 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 3 · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2313 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2287 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4600 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 4 · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
687 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
667 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1354 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 4 · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7239 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7310 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
14549 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 4 · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1893 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
1842 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
3735 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 5 · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2294 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
2217 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4511 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 5 · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
19784 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
19926 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
39710 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Comparison 5 · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4355 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
4290 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8645 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Ethnicity categories are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific row, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
HbA1c ≥7%
HbA1c ≥7% (Comparison 2)
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
7048 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
6981 Participants
n=11154 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
14029 Participants
n=22308 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
HbA1c ≥7%
HbA1c ≥7% (Comparison 3)
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8709 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
8673 Participants
n=14072 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
17382 Participants
n=28144 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
HbA1c ≥7%
HbA1c ≥7% (Comparison 4)
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5300 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
5255 Participants
n=9819 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
10555 Participants
n=19638 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
|
HbA1c ≥7%
HbA1c ≥7% (Comparison 5)
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
0 Participants
Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
16877 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
17036 Participants
n=26433 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
33913 Participants
n=52866 Participants • Data are reported separately for each prespecified pairwise comparison. For each comparison-specific measure, data are shown only for the two relevant arms; all other arms are assigned 0 participants analyzed.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12060 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12125 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality (Comparison 1)
|
876 participants with event
|
1233 participants with event
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 2, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior DPP-4 inhibitor use versus DPP-4 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10922 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10984 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality (Comparison 2)
|
815 participants with event
|
1364 participants with event
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 3, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior sulfonylurea use versus sulfonylurea-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13801 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13819 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality (Comparison 3)
|
883 participants with event
|
1736 participants with event
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 4, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior metformin use versus metformin-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9590 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9645 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality (Comparison 4)
|
631 participants with event
|
871 participants with event
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
All-cause mortality within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 5, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist versus adults receiving usual care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=25910 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=25920 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Mortality (Comparison 5)
|
1584 participants with event
|
2660 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Inpatient within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=8858 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=8015 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inpatient (Comparison 1)
|
874 participants with event
|
952 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Inpatient within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 2, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior DPP-4 inhibitor use versus DPP-4 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=7935 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=7582 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inpatient (Comparison 2)
|
784 participants with event
|
1077 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Inpatient within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 3, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior sulfonylurea use versus sulfonylurea-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10335 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9748 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inpatient (Comparison 3)
|
994 participants with event
|
1477 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Inpatient within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 4, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior metformin use versus metformin-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=7193 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=7056 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inpatient (Comparison 4)
|
622 participants with event
|
865 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Inpatient within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 5, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist versus adults receiving usual care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=19798 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=19115 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inpatient (Comparison 5)
|
1896 participants with event
|
2522 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pericardial effusion within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12093 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=11850 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pericardial Effusion (Comparison 1)
|
107 participants with event
|
128 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pericardial effusion within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 2, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior DPP-4 inhibitor use versus DPP-4 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10902 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10868 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pericardial Effusion (Comparison 2)
|
105 participants with event
|
133 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pericardial effusion within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 3, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior sulfonylurea use versus sulfonylurea-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13791 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13766 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pericardial Effusion (Comparison 3)
|
113 participants with event
|
161 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pericardial effusion within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 4, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior metformin use versus metformin-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9613 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9622 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pericardial Effusion (Comparison 4)
|
69 participants with event
|
82 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pericardial effusion within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 5, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist versus adults receiving usual care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=25908 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=25878 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pericardial Effusion (Comparison 5)
|
218 participants with event
|
261 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pulmonary embolism within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=11712 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=11608 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism (Comparison 1)
|
192 participants with event
|
217 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pulmonary embolism within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 2, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior DPP-4 inhibitor use versus DPP-4 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10624 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10603 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism (Comparison 2)
|
163 participants with event
|
216 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pulmonary embolism within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 3, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior sulfonylurea use versus sulfonylurea-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13450 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=13340 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism (Comparison 3)
|
220 participants with event
|
281 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pulmonary embolism within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 4, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior metformin use versus metformin-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9361 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9315 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism (Comparison 4)
|
123 participants with event
|
163 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Pulmonary embolism within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 5, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist versus adults receiving usual care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=25282 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=24975 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Embolism (Comparison 5)
|
385 participants with event
|
506 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Sepsis within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 1, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior SGLT2 inhibitor use versus SGLT2 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=11249 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=11054 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sepsis (Comparison 1)
|
453 participants with event
|
553 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Sepsis within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 2, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior DPP-4 inhibitor use versus DPP-4 inhibitor-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=10176 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=9970 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sepsis (Comparison 2)
|
414 participants with event
|
590 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Sepsis within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 3, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior sulfonylurea use versus sulfonylurea-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12917 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=12678 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sepsis (Comparison 3)
|
506 participants with event
|
743 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Sepsis within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 4, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist without prior metformin use versus metformin-treated adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=8979 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=8945 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sepsis (Comparison 4)
|
320 participants with event
|
406 participants with event
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From obesity-associated cancer diagnosis through 36 monthsPopulation: Participants analyzed were members of the corresponding comparison-specific propensity score-matched cohort who were at risk at the start of the 36-month assessment window. Participants with the outcome before the assessment window were excluded. Therefore, the number analyzed may differ across outcomes.
Sepsis within 36 months after obesity-associated cancer diagnosis in the propensity score-matched cohort for Comparison 5, comparing adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist versus adults receiving usual care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=24371 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist and had no SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort for Comparison 1.
|
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
n=23867 Participants
Adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes who developed an obesity-associated cancer after initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor and had no GLP-1 receptor agonist prescriptions during the comparator-specific restriction period. This group represents the propensity score-matched comparator cohort for Comparison 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sepsis (Comparison 5)
|
904 participants with event
|
1213 participants with event
|
Adverse Events
GLP-1 RA Without History of SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 876 deaths
SGLT2i (Comparison 1)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1233 deaths
GLP-1 RA Without History of DPP-4i (Comparison 2)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 815 deaths
DPP-4i (Comparison 2)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1364 deaths
GLP-1 RA Without History of Sulfonylureas (Comparison 3)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 883 deaths
Sulfonylureas (Comparison 3)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1736 deaths
GLP-1 RA Without History of Metformin (Comparison 4)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 631 deaths
Metformin (Comparison 4)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 871 deaths
GLP-1 RA (Comparison 5)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1584 deaths
Usual Care (Comparison 5)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 2660 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Yu-Nan Huang, Ph.D.
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Phone: 886-4-24739595
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place