MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Impregnated Gauze Versus Povidone Iodine Dressing in Post Trauma Wound Care

NCT07456072 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 176

Last updated 2026-03-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare rate of infection and wound healing between chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze and dry povidone-iodine dressings in post-traumatic wounds.

Conditions

  • Wound Infection Post-Traumatic
  • Wound Healing

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze

Paraffin gauze impregnated with 0.2 % chlorhexidine

PROCEDURE

Povidone iodine dressing

Standard povidone iodine dressing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-03-01
Primary Completion
2026-05-31
Completion
2026-05-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07456072 on ClinicalTrials.gov