Prospective Evaluation of Efficacy of Tumescent Steroid Infiltration in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: a Split Mouth Randomized Study

NCT07436546 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25

Last updated 2026-02-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tumescent solution on post operative sequalae in patients treated for surgical removal of impacted lower third molar. The objectives are

Primary Objective

1\. To evaluate post-operative pain severity after surgical removal of impacted lower 3rd molar under Lidocaine 2% with adrenaline with and without Tumescent steroid infiltration.

Secondary objectives

1. To evaluate post-operative trismus after surgical removal of impacted lower 3rd molar under Lidocaine 2% with adrenaline with and without Tumescent steroid infiltration
2. To evaluate post operative swelling after surgical removal of impacted lower 3rd molar under Lidocaine 2% with adrenaline with and without Tumescent steroid infiltration

Conditions

  • Impacted Third Molar
  • Impacted Third Molar Tooth
  • Third Molar Extraction
  • Third Molar Extraction Surgery

Interventions

DRUG

Tumescent Infiltration (dexamethasone, bupivacaine, adrenaline, hyaluronidase, saline)

A 15 mL tumescent solution containing dexamethasone (8 mg), bupivacaine, adrenaline (1:1000 dilution), hyaluronidase (1500 IU), and normal saline was administered via submucosal infiltration after standard inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:2,00,000). The solution was injected at the mucogingival junction on the buccal aspect of the mandibular molars and into the loose distal submucosa adjacent to the impacted third molar prior to surgical extraction. The intervention aimed to reduce postoperative inflammatory sequelae including pain, swelling, and trismus.

DRUG

2% lignocaine with adr (1:2,00,000)

Standard inferior alveolar nerve block, lingual nerve block, and long buccal nerve infiltration were administered using 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:2,00,000). No adjunctive steroid or tumescent infiltration was used in this arm. Surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar was performed using a standardized technique including mucoperiosteal flap elevation, bone guttering, tooth sectioning when required, irrigation, and suturing. Postoperative medications and follow-up protocol were identical to the test group.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dr Virendra Singh, MDS · PGIDS ROHTAK

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-03-23
Primary Completion
2025-12-23
Completion
2025-12-23

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07436546 on ClinicalTrials.gov