Comparing Implant Retention Versus Removal for MRONJ at Implant Sites
NCT07435259 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-08-10
Summary
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a condition that can occur in patients who take medications such as antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis and other bone-related systemic diseases. Although the overall risk is relatively low, the number of affected patients is increasing as the population ages and dental implants are increasingly used to restore chewing function. When MRONJ develops at an implant site, deciding whether to keep or remove the implant becomes a difficult clinical problem.
Current treatment recommendations for MRONJ are mainly based on disease stage. However, in situations where only part of the bone around an implant is affected, and the entire implant surface is not involved, there are no clear, evidence-based criteria to guide the decision between implant retention and implant removal. Some clinicians recommend removing all implants associated with necrotic bone to reduce the risk of recurrence. Others attempt to preserve implants that appear less severely affected. Implant retention may carry a risk of delayed healing or recurrence, whereas implant removal may cause additional surgical trauma that could potentially worsen the condition. Therefore, more objective criteria are needed to support clinical decision-making.
In peri-implantitis, another disease affecting the tissues around implants, the amount of bone loss observed on radiographs is often used as a reference for treatment decisions. Traditionally, implant removal has been considered when bone loss reaches approximately 50-60% of the implant length. When bone loss is less extensive, treatment aimed at preserving the implant may be attempted. However, it is unknown whether a similar bone loss threshold applies to patients with implant-related MRONJ.
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate whether the extent of peri-implant bone loss-particularly within the range of 20% to 60% of the implant length-can serve as a practical reference for deciding whether to retain or remove an implant in patients with implant-related MRONJ. By comparing clinical outcomes between implant retention and implant removal within this range of bone loss, this study aims to determine whether a bone-loss-based criterion can support treatment decisions.
The primary outcome of the study is complete mucosal healing at 6 months after treatment. Additional outcomes, including radiographic changes assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and recurrence of MRONJ-related clinical signs, will also be evaluated during the 1-year follow-up period after treatment initiation. CBCT imaging will be performed at 6 and 12 months after treatment to assess bone changes over time. Approximately 50 patients will be enrolled in this single-center prospective study. The findings are expected to provide structured clinical data to guide implant management decisions in patients with implant-related MRONJ.
Conditions
- Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Implant Retention Surgery
Surgical removal of necrotic bone surrounding the affected implant is performed. The exposed implant surface is mechanically decontaminated (e.g., using a titanium brush) to reduce biofilm contamination. The surgical site is managed to promote mucosal healing and infection control while preserving implant stability.
- PROCEDURE
-
Implant Removal Sugery
Surgical extraction of the affected implant is performed along with the removal of surrounding necrotic bone. The surgical site is managed to promote mucosal healing and stabilization of the underlying bone.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland
collaborator OTHER -
Kyunghee University Dental Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-06
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-31
- Completion
- 2028-06-30
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sleep Bruxism and (Peri-)Implant Complications
NCT02410681 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Prevalence Rate and Related Risk Factors of Ridge Preservation
NCT06742151 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
One-time Abutment Placement Versus 4 Times Abutment Removal Around Dental Implants
NCT05711147 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Bone Augmentation Simultaneous to Implant Removal on the Prognosis of Reimplantation at the Same Site
NCT07078890 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Submerged Vs Non-Submerged Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous to Implant Placement.
NCT06695338 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Mini Implants: a Clinical Trial Comparing Different Surgical and Loading Protocols
NCT04760457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Facial Bone
NCT01821092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-implant Defects
NCT04440241 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Interforaminal Implants in an Immediate or Delayed Loading Protocol for the Elderly
NCT04292132 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Value of Reduced Keratinized Mucosa on the Secondary Prevention of Peri-implant Mucositis and Periimplantitis in Patients Attending Regular Supportive Peri-implant Care. A Longitudinal Analysis
NCT05804760 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Buccal Bone Thickness on Pathological Peri-implant Bone Loss: A 3-year Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02939222 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Success of Implant Restorations After Immediate or Delayed Implant Placement With/Without Ridge Preservation
NCT05988281 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Evaluation of Integration Success and Maintenance of Short Implants in Maxillas Needing Sinus Augmentation
NCT00725049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Dentition, Prosthesis and Antagonist Wear 3D Analysis
NCT05637619 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Changes on the Interproximal Bone Level on Direct Prostheses or With Intermediate Abutments
NCT04369170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Using of Implants With a Sloped Platform Edge
NCT06404944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement Using Open Sinus Elevation Technique With and Without Bone Grafting Material
NCT06207604 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Dimensional Changes at Different Implant-to-abutment Connections: a 1-year Clinical and Radiological Study
NCT01807416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT02710357 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06166316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Implant-supported Overdentures
NCT03777748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Healing at Non-submerged Implants Installed With Different Insertion Torques.
NCT04017156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Patients With Peri-implant Disease:a Retrospective Study
NCT02662361 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA